holy army, 150 gay partners 300 men army, part of the greek army. assembled by gao ji dasi. and captured Philip 11. at age 15, who was the father of Alexander the great king of Macedonia.
Men who weren't slaves or gay who were educated :)
unknown as homosexuals were not allowed to serve in many armies, they did not declare themselves.
Married gay men refer to each other as "husband."
No. The Fall of the Roman Empire had many factors, including corruption, bad political decisions, economic problems, and military problems. But gay Romans had nothing to do with it.
Your question is a very difficult one to answer as the ancient's outlook on sexual activity was very different from ours. On the one hand, a certain amount of gay activity was tolerated, but on the other hand, certain gay men were looked down upon. The army would be no different from the rest of society in this area. If a man were gay and joined the army, the attitude would be "so what ?". There is no factual literature (at least that I know of ) that addresses this issue.Your question is a very difficult one to answer as the ancient's outlook on sexual activity was very different from ours. On the one hand, a certain amount of gay activity was tolerated, but on the other hand, certain gay men were looked down upon. The army would be no different from the rest of society in this area. If a man were gay and joined the army, the attitude would be "so what ?". There is no factual literature (at least that I know of ) that addresses this issue.Your question is a very difficult one to answer as the ancient's outlook on sexual activity was very different from ours. On the one hand, a certain amount of gay activity was tolerated, but on the other hand, certain gay men were looked down upon. The army would be no different from the rest of society in this area. If a man were gay and joined the army, the attitude would be "so what ?". There is no factual literature (at least that I know of ) that addresses this issue.Your question is a very difficult one to answer as the ancient's outlook on sexual activity was very different from ours. On the one hand, a certain amount of gay activity was tolerated, but on the other hand, certain gay men were looked down upon. The army would be no different from the rest of society in this area. If a man were gay and joined the army, the attitude would be "so what ?". There is no factual literature (at least that I know of ) that addresses this issue.Your question is a very difficult one to answer as the ancient's outlook on sexual activity was very different from ours. On the one hand, a certain amount of gay activity was tolerated, but on the other hand, certain gay men were looked down upon. The army would be no different from the rest of society in this area. If a man were gay and joined the army, the attitude would be "so what ?". There is no factual literature (at least that I know of ) that addresses this issue.Your question is a very difficult one to answer as the ancient's outlook on sexual activity was very different from ours. On the one hand, a certain amount of gay activity was tolerated, but on the other hand, certain gay men were looked down upon. The army would be no different from the rest of society in this area. If a man were gay and joined the army, the attitude would be "so what ?". There is no factual literature (at least that I know of ) that addresses this issue.Your question is a very difficult one to answer as the ancient's outlook on sexual activity was very different from ours. On the one hand, a certain amount of gay activity was tolerated, but on the other hand, certain gay men were looked down upon. The army would be no different from the rest of society in this area. If a man were gay and joined the army, the attitude would be "so what ?". There is no factual literature (at least that I know of ) that addresses this issue.Your question is a very difficult one to answer as the ancient's outlook on sexual activity was very different from ours. On the one hand, a certain amount of gay activity was tolerated, but on the other hand, certain gay men were looked down upon. The army would be no different from the rest of society in this area. If a man were gay and joined the army, the attitude would be "so what ?". There is no factual literature (at least that I know of ) that addresses this issue.Your question is a very difficult one to answer as the ancient's outlook on sexual activity was very different from ours. On the one hand, a certain amount of gay activity was tolerated, but on the other hand, certain gay men were looked down upon. The army would be no different from the rest of society in this area. If a man were gay and joined the army, the attitude would be "so what ?". There is no factual literature (at least that I know of ) that addresses this issue.
Men who weren't slaves or gay who were educated :)
unknown as homosexuals were not allowed to serve in many armies, they did not declare themselves.
Gay men are already men.
Gay men are individuals who are attracted to other men romantically and/or sexually. Sexual orientation (being gay) does not influence someone's gender identity (being a man). Men, whether straight or gay, identify as male based on their self-perception and expression.
When women are gay, they are interested in other women. When men are gay, they are intersted in other men
Only straight men hate being called gay. Most gay men prefer the term "gay."
Gay men usually chase other men.
About 3.5% to 8% of men are gay. That is a small minority.
There is no odor particular to gay men.
Gay men do not dislike lesbians.
Gay men wear the same kinds of underwear as straight men.
No. Only a minority of gay men have AIDS.