Well, since prosperity is economic success and social classes are people who are alike...(social classes-a group of people who have similar backgrounds, income(money), and way of living) Prosperity lead to social classes by people learning more about each other and exploring. Thank you!!!!!!!!!! have fun in social studies....
The social classes in ancient Rome were not groups of people coming together to learn something. They were parts of society. A person's social class was determined by his/her birth.The social classes in ancient Rome were not groups of people coming together to learn something. They were parts of society. A person's social class was determined by his/her birth.The social classes in ancient Rome were not groups of people coming together to learn something. They were parts of society. A person's social class was determined by his/her birth.The social classes in ancient Rome were not groups of people coming together to learn something. They were parts of society. A person's social class was determined by his/her birth.The social classes in ancient Rome were not groups of people coming together to learn something. They were parts of society. A person's social class was determined by his/her birth.The social classes in ancient Rome were not groups of people coming together to learn something. They were parts of society. A person's social class was determined by his/her birth.The social classes in ancient Rome were not groups of people coming together to learn something. They were parts of society. A person's social class was determined by his/her birth.The social classes in ancient Rome were not groups of people coming together to learn something. They were parts of society. A person's social class was determined by his/her birth.The social classes in ancient Rome were not groups of people coming together to learn something. They were parts of society. A person's social class was determined by his/her birth.
The social classes didn't help everyone. It did help the rich people, because then everyone would respect them and treat them well. But for the poor people, it didin't help them. A lot of people can treat them poorly, and show no respect. That is not good. It does not really matter about what social class you are in. Everyone has to treat everybody equally. So the social classes only helped about fifty percent of the people in China.
The king invented the social classes because he wanted it to be organized, or put in order. He did it based on if the people could afford to pay taxes to the people who could pay very easily.
There was a clear distinction in the types of jobs done by people from different social classes.
Well, since prosperity is economic success and social classes are people who are alike...(social classes-a group of people who have similar backgrounds, income(money), and way of living) Prosperity lead to social classes by people learning more about each other and exploring. Thank you!!!!!!!!!! have fun in social studies....
The social classes in ancient Rome were not groups of people coming together to learn something. They were parts of society. A person's social class was determined by his/her birth.The social classes in ancient Rome were not groups of people coming together to learn something. They were parts of society. A person's social class was determined by his/her birth.The social classes in ancient Rome were not groups of people coming together to learn something. They were parts of society. A person's social class was determined by his/her birth.The social classes in ancient Rome were not groups of people coming together to learn something. They were parts of society. A person's social class was determined by his/her birth.The social classes in ancient Rome were not groups of people coming together to learn something. They were parts of society. A person's social class was determined by his/her birth.The social classes in ancient Rome were not groups of people coming together to learn something. They were parts of society. A person's social class was determined by his/her birth.The social classes in ancient Rome were not groups of people coming together to learn something. They were parts of society. A person's social class was determined by his/her birth.The social classes in ancient Rome were not groups of people coming together to learn something. They were parts of society. A person's social class was determined by his/her birth.The social classes in ancient Rome were not groups of people coming together to learn something. They were parts of society. A person's social class was determined by his/her birth.
Social classes varied. Most of the people in the classes were made of negro slaves which made up one fourth of the Maryland colony.
There were many people advising the pharaoh
The different type of people that have high classes or low classes. For example poor people or wealthy people.
kings, priest,and,enslaved people
UR held about 30,000 people,social classes included rulers and priests, trader's, craft workers, and artist's .
When the Aryans first entered India, they were divided in three social classes, the warriors, the priests and the common people.
The social classes didn't help everyone. It did help the rich people, because then everyone would respect them and treat them well. But for the poor people, it didin't help them. A lot of people can treat them poorly, and show no respect. That is not good. It does not really matter about what social class you are in. Everyone has to treat everybody equally. So the social classes only helped about fifty percent of the people in China.
There is still Caste System (social classes) in India and it puts differences between the people.
The king invented the social classes because he wanted it to be organized, or put in order. He did it based on if the people could afford to pay taxes to the people who could pay very easily.
Social classes have always existed around the world. People have always looked down on those worse off then themselves.