Medieval serfs typically did not own their homes outright; instead, they were bound to the land owned by a lord. While they often had the right to live in and cultivate their homes, the property itself was tied to the feudal estate. Serfs were required to provide labor and a portion of their produce to the lord in exchange for protection and the right to work the land. Therefore, their living arrangements were dependent on their relationship with the landowner rather than ownership in the modern sense.
The serfs were tied to the land they lived on and farmed.
No, the masters of serfs provided neither food nor clothes. They provide farming fields and homes. The serfs grew their own food and made much of their own clothes.
A serf is an unfree medieval peasant who owes labor services on a manor. It is important to understand that serfs are NOT the same thing a slaves. Serfs had their own property, money, and directed much of their own time. A serf could not move way from the manor without permission, and theytypicallyowed about two days of labor each week, but otherwise where able manage their own affairs. A serf could not be sold to another manor, nor could they be deprived of their land holdings in the village fields (if they had such holdings).
no , they didn't they were at the bottom of the medieval pyramid
serfs or villeins
No
serfs
The serfs were tied to the land they lived on and farmed.
Serfs.
it wasn't.
because of the serfs
The majority were Catholic.
No, the masters of serfs provided neither food nor clothes. They provide farming fields and homes. The serfs grew their own food and made much of their own clothes.
they had pesants and serfs do the work for them
yes except serfs
Serfs and Peasants
Serfs houses were very poorly constructed. They were made out of mud or sticks