0
What else can I help you with?
How many atomic bombs were there left after the bombing of Japan?
There were none left. Once the two bombs were dropped on Japan, there were none left in reserve. It would have taken a long time to build and create new ones.
What response did people have to the Atomic age In other words how did people's lives change?
People were optimistic at the start of the Atomic age. They thought all power generators would be atomic from then on.
Would the cities bombed by the atomic bomb just be bombed by the fire bombs?
See: Atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki
How many atomic bombs would equal a super nova?
As both atomic bombs and supernovas vary in yield, this question has no single answer.
Is there anybody that disagree that Truman should not have used the atomic bomb?
My opinion is, Truman should have used the atomic bomb. If he hadn't the war would have continued, and more would have died. Also I think that at one point the Axis would have dropped a atomic bomb on an allied city, possibly killing more then at Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
One reason against using the atomic bomb?
Radioactive waste would cause unborn babies to die/ have mutations.
When would scientists need to change a theory?
Scientists had made observations that did not fit exactly with Dalton's theory. Scientists changed the atomic theory to include this new knowledge. While the modern atomic theory is based on Dalton's theory, it is also very different.
What kind of scientist studies atomic energy and radioactive fallout?
A Nuclear Physicist or Researcher or Technician would be scientists who know that.
How did the earlier scientists and their contributions directly affect the discoveries of later scientists?
Since glass was invented, the scientists were able to create the microscope. If this was never invented, the scientists would never have been able to discover cells.
How did the earlier scientists their contributions directly affect the discoveries of the later scientists?
Since glass was invented, the scientists were able to create the microscope. If this was never invented, the scientists would never have been able to discover cells.
Can scientists create another planet?
Currently, scientists do not have the technology or capability to create another planet. Creating a whole new planet would involve vast resources, advanced technology, and knowledge beyond our current capabilities. While scientists can study planets, they cannot create one from scratch.
What effects can mutations have on a virus?
They create genetic variations.
The atomic theory was supported by mendeleev when scientist did what?
The atomic theory was supported by Mendeleev when scientists discovered that elements displayed a periodic trend in their properties when arranged by increasing atomic weight. Mendeleev used this information to create the periodic table, organizing elements by their atomic weights and predicting the properties of missing elements.
Who is the US scientist that is credited for making the atomic bomb?
There were literally thousands of scientists who participated; if you had to single one out, it would probably be scientific director Robert Oppenheimer.
What would happen if we didn't have mutations?
Without mutations, there would be no genetic variation, making evolution impossible. Mutations are essential for introducing new traits and diversity in populations, which allows for natural selection to act upon. Therefore, without mutations, species would not be able to adapt to changing environments and would likely become extinct.
Why do scientists make big bombs?
Some scientists belived that making huge atomic bombs would actually put an end to war, making the ultimate weapon that people were to afraid to use. Other scientists have worked for their country to produce large bombs, so that their country will remain a dominant world power.
How long would you have to fart to create as much energy as an atomic bomb?
Approximately a trillion years. And most people don't live that long.
