Daniel Shay's Rebellion proved that the Articles of Confederation was not enough for peacetime. George Washington was very concerned as were many other American leaders. The Articles of Confederation only allowed for troops for times of war, not for domestic disturbances. Alexander Hamilton, James Madison and John Jay wrote about the needs of the federal government in the Federal Papers that were published in newspapers of the time.
The central government did not provide troops to quell the rebellion.
SUCKER...... i want to know too
Yes, Shays' Rebellion highlighted the weaknesses of the central government under the Articles of Confederation. The uprising, which occurred in 1786-1787, demonstrated the government's inability to maintain order and address economic distress, as it struggled to raise a militia to quell the rebellion. This lack of federal authority and financial power ultimately contributed to calls for a stronger central government, leading to the Constitutional Convention of 1787.
shays rebellion proved the need for a stronger government, so no it didn't
Shays's Rebellion would change the opinion in favor of those who wanted the Constitution to structure a stronger central government.
The central government did not provide troops to quell the rebellion.
It is false that Shays' Rebellion was carried out to support a weak central government. The rebellion was carried out by farmers who were upset with the courts taking their farms.
It is false that Shays' Rebellion was carried out to support a weak central government. The rebellion was carried out by farmers who were upset with the courts taking their farms.
SUCKER...... i want to know too
SUCKER...... i want to know too
the united states did not have enough arsenals
Yes, Shays' Rebellion highlighted the weaknesses of the central government under the Articles of Confederation. The uprising, which occurred in 1786-1787, demonstrated the government's inability to maintain order and address economic distress, as it struggled to raise a militia to quell the rebellion. This lack of federal authority and financial power ultimately contributed to calls for a stronger central government, leading to the Constitutional Convention of 1787.
Daniel shays
The price of a weak central government is anarchy.
shays rebellion proved the need for a stronger government, so no it didn't
Shays's Rebellion would change the opinion in favor of those who wanted the Constitution to structure a stronger central government.
Shays's Rebellion would change the opinion in favor of those who wanted the Constitution to structure a stronger central government.