The outcome of the Boston massacre was that it later lead to the Revolutionary war, and then the Boston tea party.
The Boston Massacre was not a war, and it did not happen during a war. The Boston Massacre was a confrontation between a rowdy mob of people in Boston and a small detachment of British troops. Five civilians eventually died of wounds received during the event.
The Boston Massacre
the Boston Massacre was the first acts of violence recorded about the war.
It had no strategic or tactical advantage but, it was a propoganda victory.
The outcome of the Boston massacre was that it later lead to the Revolutionary war, and then the Boston tea party.
There is a lot that lead up to that but the main to is all the taxes acts and the boston massacre
He lead the sons of liberty ,who as you probably know, was responsible for the Boston tea party and the Boston massacre.
The Boston Massacre was not a war, and it did not happen during a war. The Boston Massacre was a confrontation between a rowdy mob of people in Boston and a small detachment of British troops. Five civilians eventually died of wounds received during the event.
Yes , I think it did. It led toward it, but the start of it was the battles of Lexington and concord.
Considering the Boston Massacre occurred 5 years before the start of the Revolution, the war had nothing to do with it.
Jesus
Nothing. The Boston Massacer was before the Revolutionary war.
One other war that the redcoats fought in besides the Boston Massacre (which really wasn't a "massacre" because only five people were killed) was the Revolutionary War.
The colonists reacted to the Boston Massacre by forming militias and eventually fighting the British in the American Revolution. It is sometimes said that the Massacre was the start of the war.
The Boston Massacre
The two events that happened in Boston before the American Revolutionary War started were the Boston Massacre and the Boston Tea Party.