agreeing not to end the slave trade for at least 20 years
Conflict between slave owners and people who wanted slavery to end
No, It only was prohibited to any new states that would enter the union from that date forward. MO could not have slaves. Maryland was entered the union as a "free" state. No states that would later come into the union that initially territory within the Louisanna Purchase could not have slaves.
To end an argument about slavery in the territories (apex)
The main goal was to keep the balance of free States in line with the slave States. There were two Missouri Compromises. The first one was in 1820 and the famous US politician, Henry Clay was the Speaker of the House of Representatives, and was the key figure in the Compromise debates. The second Missouri Compromise of 1850, had the goal of establishing a guideline for determining free and slave state status. The Fugitive Slave Act is considered part of this compromise.
agreeing not to end the slave trade for at least 20 years
apparently it was 1807 but it carried on to 1886
Conflict between slave owners and people who wanted to end slavery to end. (apex)
Conflict between slave owners and people who wanted slavery to end
No, It only was prohibited to any new states that would enter the union from that date forward. MO could not have slaves. Maryland was entered the union as a "free" state. No states that would later come into the union that initially territory within the Louisanna Purchase could not have slaves.
To end an argument about slavery in the territories (apex)
The main goal was to keep the balance of free States in line with the slave States. There were two Missouri Compromises. The first one was in 1820 and the famous US politician, Henry Clay was the Speaker of the House of Representatives, and was the key figure in the Compromise debates. The second Missouri Compromise of 1850, had the goal of establishing a guideline for determining free and slave state status. The Fugitive Slave Act is considered part of this compromise.
Three-fifths compromise
No, the Missouri Compromise did not end slavery in the South. Instead, it was an attempt to maintain a balance between free and slave states by admitting Missouri as a slave state and Maine as a free state. The compromise established a line (the 36°30' parallel) to determine the future status of slavery in territories north and south of that line, but it ultimately did not resolve the underlying tensions over slavery, which continued to escalate leading to the Civil War.
Republican party
yes the compromise ended slavery in the capitol
to end an agruement about the territories