the Romans would slaughter their enemies at a distance. shields wouldn't be thick enough to absorb the shots and the Roman Empire would live on
The Romans called the Netherlands, Batavia.The Romans called the Netherlands, Batavia.The Romans called the Netherlands, Batavia.The Romans called the Netherlands, Batavia.The Romans called the Netherlands, Batavia.The Romans called the Netherlands, Batavia.The Romans called the Netherlands, Batavia.The Romans called the Netherlands, Batavia.The Romans called the Netherlands, Batavia.
No, and neither did the rich Romans. The Romans did not use butter, they used oil in its place.No, and neither did the rich Romans. The Romans did not use butter, they used oil in its place.No, and neither did the rich Romans. The Romans did not use butter, they used oil in its place.No, and neither did the rich Romans. The Romans did not use butter, they used oil in its place.No, and neither did the rich Romans. The Romans did not use butter, they used oil in its place.No, and neither did the rich Romans. The Romans did not use butter, they used oil in its place.No, and neither did the rich Romans. The Romans did not use butter, they used oil in its place.No, and neither did the rich Romans. The Romans did not use butter, they used oil in its place.No, and neither did the rich Romans. The Romans did not use butter, they used oil in its place.
Ancient Romans. No
Latin was the language of the ancient Romans. As the Romans expanded into Italy, they also brought their language with them.Latin was the language of the ancient Romans. As the Romans expanded into Italy, they also brought their language with them.Latin was the language of the ancient Romans. As the Romans expanded into Italy, they also brought their language with them.Latin was the language of the ancient Romans. As the Romans expanded into Italy, they also brought their language with them.Latin was the language of the ancient Romans. As the Romans expanded into Italy, they also brought their language with them.Latin was the language of the ancient Romans. As the Romans expanded into Italy, they also brought their language with them.Latin was the language of the ancient Romans. As the Romans expanded into Italy, they also brought their language with them.Latin was the language of the ancient Romans. As the Romans expanded into Italy, they also brought their language with them.Latin was the language of the ancient Romans. As the Romans expanded into Italy, they also brought their language with them.
Yes. the Romans had provinces in both Europe and Africa.Yes. the Romans had provinces in both Europe and Africa.Yes. the Romans had provinces in both Europe and Africa.Yes. the Romans had provinces in both Europe and Africa.Yes. the Romans had provinces in both Europe and Africa.Yes. the Romans had provinces in both Europe and Africa.Yes. the Romans had provinces in both Europe and Africa.Yes. the Romans had provinces in both Europe and Africa.Yes. the Romans had provinces in both Europe and Africa.
No they were beyond that. Romans used spears. Pioneers had guns.
Guns did not exist at the time of the Romans, so there is no trueLatin word for gun. Sorry.
I assume your talking about ancient Celts the ones in roman times. If so no guns were not invented then if the Celts had a gun they wouldn't have lost so many men to the Romans. MistroJoe
The collective nouns are a collection of guns, an armory of guns, or an arsenal of guns.
hand guns , long guns, Air guns , Rifle these are used as a firearms .
No. Machine guns will beat Gatling guns.
Long guns and hand guns.
with the invention of firearms, swords started to fall by the wayside. with firearms, you have projectiles, swords don't. think about lining up a roman legion against several machine guns. the machine guns would destroy the romans. swords just became ineffective, though are still occasionally used as decoration.
usually fake guns, powdered guns, or guns without any bullets
The Romans called London "Londinium".The Romans called London "Londinium".The Romans called London "Londinium".The Romans called London "Londinium".The Romans called London "Londinium".The Romans called London "Londinium".The Romans called London "Londinium".The Romans called London "Londinium".The Romans called London "Londinium".
The Romans had kings for about 243 years.The Romans had kings for about 243 years.The Romans had kings for about 243 years.The Romans had kings for about 243 years.The Romans had kings for about 243 years.The Romans had kings for about 243 years.The Romans had kings for about 243 years.The Romans had kings for about 243 years.The Romans had kings for about 243 years.
The Romans called the Netherlands, Batavia.The Romans called the Netherlands, Batavia.The Romans called the Netherlands, Batavia.The Romans called the Netherlands, Batavia.The Romans called the Netherlands, Batavia.The Romans called the Netherlands, Batavia.The Romans called the Netherlands, Batavia.The Romans called the Netherlands, Batavia.The Romans called the Netherlands, Batavia.