it depends on your definition of "cannon" since in a strict sense the answer is no , but that's because the guns they were using was too small to be considered a Cannon in the definition.
They used smaller bombards , gunpowder fueled projectile appeared first in China and saw continued use, but they didn't develop truly large cannons until they were introduced Dutch style Cannons in the early 17th Century for a variety of reason.
Some of them include horses, iron plating and gunpowder weapons, such as primitive muskets as well as cannons.
no, cannons and gunpowder only appeared in Europe in the 1300s.
No, the Roman legions did not use cannons. Cannons were developed much later, in the 14th century, well after the fall of the Western Roman Empire in the 5th century. Roman military technology primarily included infantry tactics, siege engines, and artillery like ballistae and catapults, but not gunpowder weapons.
Heavy guns; cannons and mortars, replaced catapaults circa the 14th Century.
Yes, the English did use cannons during the Hundred Years War, particularly in the later stages of the conflict. The introduction of gunpowder artillery, including cannons and bombards, marked a significant shift in military technology and tactics. Notably, the English employed cannons during the siege of Harfleur in 1415 and at the Battle of Castillon in 1453, which contributed to their effectiveness in siege warfare. However, traditional archery and infantry tactics remained predominant throughout much of the war.
Some of them include horses, iron plating and gunpowder weapons, such as primitive muskets as well as cannons.
919 A.D. They first used it for cannons
no, cannons and gunpowder only appeared in Europe in the 1300s.
Yes. The Mongols were defeated by the Mamluk use of hand cannons in 1260, and by 1282, Mongols had cannons of their own in Manchuria. First use of cannons was by the Chinese back in 1128. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_cannon
gunpowder
guns and cannons
all sorts of armor! steel swords, cannons, and guns were some of the weapons though.
It's an explosive powder used in guns, cannons, and rifles. Hence the name gunpowder.
No, the Roman legions did not use cannons. Cannons were developed much later, in the 14th century, well after the fall of the Western Roman Empire in the 5th century. Roman military technology primarily included infantry tactics, siege engines, and artillery like ballistae and catapults, but not gunpowder weapons.
They served as cannons before gunpowder came along.
It was used to make fireworks, small bombs, explosives,firearms,and cannons .
because they had gunpowder and cannons to attack castles which couldn't withstand a cannon blast