was slaves counted as people or property
south wanted to enslave Africans to be counted as part of their population , but north disagreed they wanted the number of slaves to determine taxes but not representation
The Three Fifths Compromise solved the problem of how population should be counted in slave states in terms of representation in Congress as well as tax purposes. Since black slaves made up a significant part of the population in the southern states, and they did not have the right to vote, it was declared that the slaves would represent three fifths of a white person. Short answer: allowed the slaves states to count a slave as three fifths of a person
a disagreement between slave state and free states over whether slaves should be counted as part of the population
Leading up to the Three-Fifths Compromise, southern states argued that enslaved individuals should be counted as part of the population for representation in Congress, despite them lacking voting rights. They contended that including enslaved people in the population count would give the South more political power and influence, helping to offset the population advantage of the northern states. Conversely, northern states opposed this notion, arguing that since enslaved individuals were not citizens and could not vote, they should not be counted for representation purposes. Ultimately, the compromise resulted in enslaved individuals being counted as three-fifths of a person for congressional representation and taxation.
was slaves counted as people or property
south wanted to enslave Africans to be counted as part of their population , but north disagreed they wanted the number of slaves to determine taxes but not representation
One-Half Compromise was the compromise that dealt with the Northern States concern of the Southern States using slaves as part of the counted population thus influencing their representation in Congress.
Every slave counted as three-fifths of a person. So if there were 5,000 slaves, 3,000 were counted as a 'citizen' or part of the population.
Every slave counted as three-fifths of a person. So if there were 5,000 slaves, 3,000 were counted as a 'citizen' or part of the population.
Southern states, such as Georgia and South Carolina, wanted slaves to be counted as part of the population when determining taxes. This would give them more representation in the government and more political power.
The Three Fifths Compromise solved the problem of how population should be counted in slave states in terms of representation in Congress as well as tax purposes. Since black slaves made up a significant part of the population in the southern states, and they did not have the right to vote, it was declared that the slaves would represent three fifths of a white person. Short answer: allowed the slaves states to count a slave as three fifths of a person
a disagreement between slave state and free states over whether slaves should be counted as part of the population
William Blount believed that slaves should be counted as part of the population for the purpose of determining representation in Congress and for the allocation of taxes. He supported the Three-Fifths Compromise, where slaves were counted as three-fifths of a person for these purposes.
a disagreement between slave state and free states over whether slaves should be counted as part of the population
A disagreement between slave states and free states over whether slaves should be counted as a part of the population.
A disagreement between slave states and free states over whether slaves should be counted as a part of the population.