At the end of World War II, few questioned Truman's decision to drop the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Most Americans accepted the obvious reasoning: the atomic bombings brought the war to a more timely end. They did not have a problem with over one hundred thousand of the enemy being killed. After all, the Japanese attacked America, and not the other way around. In later years, however, many have begun to question the conventional wisdom of "Truman was saving lives," putting forth theories of their own. However, when one examines the issue with great attention to the results of the atomic bombings and compares these results with possible alternatives to using said bombs, the line between truth and fiction begins to clear. Truman's decision to use the atomic bomb on Japan was for the purpose of saving lives and ending the war quickly in order to prevent a disastrous land invasion.
don't look at me, I don't know....
Criticism for having used it
There were three or four reasons why but the main one was to end the war.
porket may atomic , bomb agad,
the us created the atomic bomb
They surrendered to the U.S. But only after the second bomb!
don't look at me, I don't know....
No. That was one of the reasons it was a target for the atomic bomb. Any damage done had to be done by the single bomb.
Einstein did not make the atomic bomb, so it was neither good nor bad.
Criticism for having used it
fullfill prophecy
One was the possibility of a "fizzle". An atomic reaction without an explosion would impress no one.
If you consider the US atomic bomb is a Christian bomb, the French atomic bomb is also Christian bomb and so on, then you can name the Pakistani atomic bomb an Islamic bomb.
how was the atomic bomb repaired
There were three or four reasons why but the main one was to end the war.
18th May1998, but its not atomic bomb (its nuclear bomb)
Japan bombed Hawaii. (pearl harbor)