The typical peasant house was a cottage of one or two rooms, usually 15 feet or so in width, and of varying length. In some cases a structure for housing animals was connected directly to the house, in other cases there would have been separate byres or pens for animals within a barnyard complex of various outbuildings and utility structures.
Please keep in mind this is a generalization. Some areas such as viking settlements or anglo-norse areas had larger longhouses that were communal for larger numbers of people. Also, not all peasants were of the same wealth. A small number managed to gain control of enough land to generate a significant agricultural surplus, and thus considerable comfort compared to their neighbors. Such peasants would have had more elaborate houses, possibly even adding a second story after fireplaces came into use in the 12th century, or upper solar adjacent to the main hall of the house.
Urban housing patterns were different as well. The working poor in medieval towns and cities would have dwelled in a tenement, meaning a multipurpose building of several stories that may have included workshop, living, and even warehouse space. The upper classes would have had a house with workshop or business area on the first floor and several floors of living space. The poor shared houses, or rented a floor, garret, or even a single chamber withing a larger structure.
Medieval serfs typically did not own their homes outright; instead, they were bound to the land owned by a lord. While they often had the right to live in and cultivate their homes, the property itself was tied to the feudal estate. Serfs were required to provide labor and a portion of their produce to the lord in exchange for protection and the right to work the land. Therefore, their living arrangements were dependent on their relationship with the landowner rather than ownership in the modern sense.
I'm pretty sure that peasants and serfs may sell there homes and other belongings to become free men.
No, the masters of serfs provided neither food nor clothes. They provide farming fields and homes. The serfs grew their own food and made much of their own clothes.
Serfs were bound to the land.Best of luck to A+Serfs are bound to the land. A+
Phragmites were used to thatch roofs and to weave baskets and such things. They did not grow everywhere, but where they did grow, serfs probably used them.
No
I'm pretty sure that peasants and serfs may sell there homes and other belongings to become free men.
No, the masters of serfs provided neither food nor clothes. They provide farming fields and homes. The serfs grew their own food and made much of their own clothes.
When working in the field, well.... in the fields. Around their homes they might have a "privy" or outhouse, sometimes called "the jakes". Pretty primitive.
Serfs were bound to the land.Best of luck to A+Serfs are bound to the land. A+
Serfs are Islamic
Serfs were bound to the land.Best of luck to A+Serfs are bound to the land. A+
Phragmites were used to thatch roofs and to weave baskets and such things. They did not grow everywhere, but where they did grow, serfs probably used them.
Serfs in Europe were not allowed to leave the manor which they were tied to unless given permission by their lord. If they were caught leaving they were severely punished. Does this mean none of them traveled at all? Of course not and I'm sure there are instances of escape to freedom. As a whole however, serfs did not really travel. Have they "ever traveled" yeah, of course. If I could think of an instance of mass travelling serfs, at least widely, I'd think of indentured servants. While these were not serfs, they came to America and essentially became serfs who payed their passage to the Americas by working for seven years. They were pretty much slaves, just like serfs.
Most serfs lived on manors. These were farming estates that belonged to lords, and whose residents were mostly serfs. The serfs typically lived in a village or hamlet on the manor, in cottages. Some serfs were not agricultural and worked as laborers. They typically lived in cottages in villages or boarding houses in towns.
There are no serfs in Russia today.
Serfs were barely above slaves themselves. I doubt any serfs ever owned slaves.