i dont no
Alexander the Great's Macedonian Empire was the largest in size before the Roman Empire, although it was very short-lived. The largest enduring Empire before Rome was the Persian Empire destroyed by Alexander.
If it is on size then it was Alexander's empire because it was so vast that it stretched from Italy to the present India(eastawards). This ws truly very vast. If on good army power and maitenance then it would be Julius Caesar's Roman Empire(after alexander). If not, probably the Persian empire.
what is the size of the Incas empire
Diocletian divided the leadership of the Roman Empire to improve its governance and address the challenges of its vast size and internal instability. By establishing the Tetrarchy in 293 CE, he created a system where four leaders, two senior emperors (Augusti) and two junior emperors (Caesares), could more effectively manage different regions and respond swiftly to threats. This division aimed to enhance administrative efficiency, maintain order, and stabilize the empire during a time of crisis. Ultimately, Diocletian's reforms sought to restore strength and unity to the empire.
No. It was under Trajan that the empire reached its largest size.
He liked trains to much
Throughout Alexander's rise to power and reign, the Greek Empire nearly quadrupled in size, the Greek Empire under his rule still remains the largest empire in living history. He ended the power of the city-states and established a unified nation.
Alexander the Great's Macedonian Empire was the largest in size before the Roman Empire, although it was very short-lived. The largest enduring Empire before Rome was the Persian Empire destroyed by Alexander.
If it is on size then it was Alexander's empire because it was so vast that it stretched from Italy to the present India(eastawards). This ws truly very vast. If on good army power and maitenance then it would be Julius Caesar's Roman Empire(after alexander). If not, probably the Persian empire.
It would have to be Alexander the Great because before him Greece never had an empire, just a confederation of city-states.
From Egypt to the middle of Asia . . . about 3,000 miles . . . about the size of the continental U.S.
It would be harder because they would have to make more coins because the population would be growing
Pick up a needle. Imagine that needle's size if it was 1000000 times smaller. That is the size of Lewis Alexander's penis. Pick up a needle. Imagine that needle's size if it was 1000000 times smaller. That is the size of Lewis Alexander's penis.
In thinking of the decline of the Roman Empire, it should be remembered that the decline of the empire was a cumulative thing. There were several factors that worked together to weaken the empire. Some of them were pressure on the borders, a weakened army, no effective military leadership, no new territories which could bring in new sources of revenue, lead poisoning, the sheer size of the empire and the lack of decent communications.
It is the theory that there is not a one-size-fits-all leadership strategy, meaning that effective leadership is contextual.
It is the theory that there is not a one-size-fits-all leadership strategy, meaning that effective leadership is contextual.
what is the size of the Incas empire