Jonathan Sewall justified the rule of a king by emphasizing the necessity of a strong central authority to maintain order and stability within society. He argued that a monarch provided a sense of continuity and protection against the chaos that could arise from more democratic forms of governance. Sewall believed that a king, as a divinely appointed leader, was best positioned to make decisions for the common good, ensuring justice and the welfare of the populace. This perspective reflected his loyalty to British governance and skepticism towards revolutionary ideas.
Introduction
cock
It said that a weak or unjust ruler had no right to rule, thus giving emperors an excuse for overthrowing an older dynasty or king.
justify the actions of people seeking to overthrow British colonial rule
these quotes were used against home rule - "home rule is rome rule" - the catholic church would dominate the new state. "ulster will fight and ulster will be right" - to justify a rebellion in ulster against home rule
justify the purpose of an expenditure
To introduce what the Declaration itself intends to do (that is, justify the American overthrow of British rule). OR It explains what the Declaration sets out to do - justify the overthrow of British rule.
Jonathan and the future king David were the best of friends. 1 Samuel 18:1 (New Living Translation) states: "After David had finished talking with Saul, he met Jonathan, the king's son. There was an immediate bond between them, for Jonathan loved David." Even though Jonathan was the legal heir to Saul's throne, he supported David as the future King after his father's rule (1 Samuel 23:15-18). Jonathan risked his life to protect David from his father's plan to kill David. (1 Samuel 20:1-42)
They thought that God had given them the right to rule as they chose.
necessary expense rule
justify the purpose of an expenditure
necessary expense rule
necessary expense rule
justify the purpose of an expenditure
necessary expense rule
necessary expense rule
The introduction.