answersLogoWhite

0

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

Which historical event had an effect on Modernism?

Industrialization Apex: The great migration


How did social Darwinism effect europeans attitudes?

It led Europeans to believe that they were better than Asians and Africans.


What are cubism and impressionism forms of?

Cubism and Impressionism are both types of artistic style. The former emphasizes the representation of geometric shapes while the later concentrates on the general tone and effect produced by a subject, without elaboration of details.


What were the long-term effect of Marx and Engels's The Communist Manifesto?

In the 1900's, Marxism inspired revolutionaries such as Vladimir Lenin.


What is Social Darwinism what do you think about Social Darwinism do you think the ideas of Social Darwinism still have an effect on our society why or why not?

Social Darwinism is a belief that certain individuals or groups of people are more fit to survive and prosper in society because of their inherent superiority. This concept has been widely discredited as it promotes discrimination, inequality, and justifies harmful social practices. While the explicit ideas of Social Darwinism may not be as prevalent today, its influence can still be seen in discriminatory attitudes and unequal power dynamics in society.


Modernism effects on religion?

There are many modern effects that can be seen taking place in religion. The acceptance of homosexuality for example is a modern effect on certain religions.


What style of painting did Monet use?

Monet used a dabbing effect as well as rapid brushstrokes, mainly using oil paints in his artwork.


How did social Darwinism effect on imperialism?

Social Darwinism was used to justify imperialism by arguing that the strongest nations should conquer weaker ones in order to ensure their survival and dominance. This belief system provided a moral justification for the exploitation and colonization of other societies, leading to increased competition for resources and territories among colonial powers. Ultimately, social Darwinism fueled the expansion of empires and the subjugation of indigenous peoples in the name of progress and civilization.


Which is an example of an effect of social Darwinism in the late 1800s?

One example of an effect of social Darwinism in the late 1800s was the justification of imperialist expansion and colonization by powerful nations as a way to spread their influence and dominate "weaker" societies. This ideology also contributed to the idea of laissez-faire capitalism, where there was minimal government intervention in economic and social matters, leading to widening income inequalities and exploitation of vulnerable populations.


What was social Darwinism and how it affected people's views on imperialism?

Social Darwinism i like the evolution of humans. It states that the most fittest will continue to survive and reproduce, like survival of the fittest. I guess the effect of it on imperialism is that people want to be on top so they tried to conquer all they could to get all the valuables in those places they've conquered and so they can be the fittest.


How did rationalism affect the Catholic Church?

Rationalism as defined by Attwater in A Catholic Dictionary: Rationalism: " The error of those who reject all revelation and give assent to nothing but what can be attained by the natural power of their reason." Rationalism is a heresy, which had some effect on the heresy of Modernism, and particularly on the Deists. It affected the Church primarily through Modernism, which has been particularly prevalent since the Second Vatican Council.


Is the monopoly contrary to the precepts of Darwinism?

Well, first of all, Darwinism doesn't really have precepts: it's a description for how things are in nature, not a set of instructions for how we should do things. In Darwinism, too little variation has the effect of endangering the reproductive fitness of populations. Too little variation means that a population might not be able to adapt when the circumstances change. There would seem to be some similarities between our global economy and ecology. Certainly, if one values a robust and sound economy, one would prevent monopolies from gaining so much influence that their demise cripples the economy. On the other hand, those who make the mistake of promoting Social Darwinism, committing the naturalistic fallacy, might argue that as only the strongest survive, monopolies are a natural and thus desireable consequence of the free market.