Union Major General William T. Sherman was an outspoken general. He never hesitated to speak his mind on the various elements of the US Civil War. He rated the enemy cavalry highly, calling them expert riders, first-rate shots and brave horsemen.
Military theorist Carl Von Clausewitz graded the quality of a battlefield victory on several factors. For him the value or the degree of a battlefield victory depended on whether the skill of the winning general was able to outflank the enemy. He also placed emphasis on whether the rough terrain impacted the results of the battle and what army had the superior cavalry.
General Samuel Cooper, who served as Adjutant General and Inspector General was the highest ranking military officer in the CSA. Cooper technically outranked General Robert E. Lee because he had been advanced to the rank of full general at an earlier date, 16 May 1861. That said, Lee's, later, appointment by the CSA Congress as general-in-chief, 23 January 1865, could be looked upon as an advancement to five star level.
Dragoons are mounted infantry. For mobility, they ride on horseback like cavalry but dismount and fight on foot when they reach the battlefield. They also had guns called dragons (that's how they got their name) that fired one shot and there horses were a poor quality called Nags.
Unwilling conscripts, general problems with morale both in the military and society, desertion, lower quality of conscripts.
The invasion of Maryland by Confederate General Robert E. Lee has been the subject of criticism in a number of ways. Many historians believe that Lee took an unnecessary risk by exposing his army to possible destruction by a much superior Federal force. Critics fault Lee for over estimating the numbers and physical condition of his infantry. The plan to invade Maryland required extensive and rapid marches for his army that had been depleted by massive straggling. Critics say that Lee made the error in basing his maneuvers on assumptions that Union General McClellan would do, and neglecting to make adequate allowances for what a Union army on its own territory was capable of doing. Lee was also wrong about the quality of the Union army he would be facing. The Army of the Potomac was not at all deficient in morale, and nearly broke Lee's line despite the tactical ineptitude of their commander.
During the first half of the American Civil War, Confederate cavalry was, indeed, superior to Union cavalry due to superior training and experience on the part of Southern officers and troopers. As the war progressed, Union quality increased dramatically, while attrition among Confederate cavalry led to a sharp decrease in its fighting effectiveness.
As the Confederate army under the leadership of General John Bell Hood approached Tennessee, Union generals Thomas and Shofield had concerns. According to some historians, they believed their troops were inferior to Hood's in number and quality. Also, Thomas had lost 15,000 men discharged by service expirations. He gained 12,000 new recruits but they were raw and lacked experience. To add to their worries, the Union cavalry was seen to be inferior to the cavalry of the Rebels led by the famous General Nathan Bedford Forrest.
Sherman M. Wyman has written: 'Water quality versus residential development' -- subject- s -: Lakes, Recreational use, Water quality
There were a number of problems facing Union General John Pope as the Second Battle of Bull Run was soon to begin. One problem was the fact that the Confederate forces were far more mobile. For example, Stonewall Jackson's infantry was able to march 120 miles in two days. Also, Pope could not match the quality of the Southern cavalry. The knowledge of the terrain was also against Pope. The Rebels knew more about the landscape then did Pope.
If you want to find Ben Sherman Jackets for low prices a good place to look would be the store TK Maxx, they sell top quality brands for very low prices.
Kenneth L. Stiles has written: '4th Virginia Cavalry' -- subject(s): Confederate States of America, Confederate States of America. Army. Virginia Cavalry Regiment, 4th, History, Regimental histories, Registers, United States Civil War, 1861-1865, Virginia Civil War, 1861-1865
Military theorist Carl Von Clausewitz graded the quality of a battlefield victory on several factors. For him the value or the degree of a battlefield victory depended on whether the skill of the winning general was able to outflank the enemy. He also placed emphasis on whether the rough terrain impacted the results of the battle and what army had the superior cavalry.
Yes general electric refrigerators are good quality You can go to the following website for reviews on them http://www.refrigeratorpro.com/GE-Refrigerator.html
Quality of the enemy - a naturally soldierlike breed, led by some of the best officers in America, who had resigned to join the Confederates. The policies of Henry Halleck (Union General-in-Chief 1862-4), who believed in occupying territory rather than destroying armies. The lack of a cavalry tradition, so the Southern cavalry was able to run rings round them in the first two years. Lincoln's failure to choose and use the best Generals in the earlier part of the war.
It's impossible to give that question a "number" answer. Two things should be considered, though - the reliabilty of firerarms in general - whle imporving - still was not on the level that it is today. And especially this: By and large, the weapons issued to the Union soldiers were of higher quality, and better construction and design than the weapons the Confederate army were using overall. Many of the Confederate soldiers merely used whatever they could get their hands on.
Robert E. Lee is the most obvious choice for that honour - especially as he combined battlefield success with a special quality of nobility and human greatness. Many considered him the true embodiment of the Confederate soul and spirit. However, his military talent cannot really be judged in isolation from Stonewall Jackson, team-partner in all his great victories, and after Stonewall's death at Chancellorsville, Lee was never on top form again, though Heart disease (mis-diagnosed as rheumatism) may have had something to do with this. It is significant that both Grant and Sherman rated Joseph E. Johnston higher than Lee, but Johnston fell foul of his own president Jefferson Davis. There was also Sidney Johnston (no relation), rated as the best General in America at the outbreak of the war, but he was killed at Shiloh, before his promise could be properly tested. Finally, Jefferson Davis declared that his biggest mistake had been not to promote Bedford Forrest, a wild, self-taught cavalry leader who dominated Western Tennessee until the very last weeks of the war.
Need to re-word that one, partner - he was never a US General! However, if you're asking whether he was the best General in America, that is indeed an FAQ, though not possible to answer categorically. At the outbreak of war, the best General in America (still young enough for field command) was believed to be Sidney Johnston, who joined the Confederates, but was killed in the early operations in Western Tennessee. For this reason, he has become a mythical Lost Leader, and one of the great "What if's?" of the war. Few would question that it was the Confederates who creamed off the best Generals, and that on the Union side, neither Grant nor Sherman. although victorious, could be described as 'great', either in leadership or in human quality. This leaves two other contenders for the title, apart from Lee. One was Joseph E. Johnston (no relation), who feuded sharply with the Southern president Jefferson Davis, partly because Johnston, however brilliant, did not display enough of the reckless Confederate spirit, being much pre-occupied with conserving manpower. (Significantly, both Grant and Sherman rated Johnston above Lee.) The other was Bedford Forrest, an astonishingly successful cavalry leader, especially in the Tennessee mountains he knew so well. Of humble birth, rough, brutal and self-taught, he was always under-estimated by the aristocratic Davis, who later admitted that his failure to promote Forrest was the biggest mistake of his career. (Another "What if?") The consensus might be that Lee was the best General of his kind - a quick, nimble mover, able to exploit delays and indecision on the other side (though it was Stonewall Jackson who actually carried out these bold thrusts). He also managed to inspire fanatical loyalty from the rank-and-file who followed him till they were barefoot and starving - apparently responding to his gracious, noble demeanour that was perhaps the elusive quality of human greatness.