Militarism-countries wanted theirs to have the biggest armies so they competed with each other when one of them got a bigger military Nationalism-countries felt theirs was the best so they tried to be on top and outdo each other http://americanhistory.about.com/od/worldwari/tp/causes-of-world-war-1.htm http://answers.Yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20070531183544AANY900
nothing ......... x0x0x0x0x0x0
. A nation might turn to military leaders and Extreme Nationalists during a time of crisis because these leaders have a far greater sense of nationalism than government leaders or politicians. This sense of nationalism would inspire the people and make them far more likely to get through the crisis at hand.
They scared off the near countries with threats and they gave up without a fight. they also shot bombs at them to prove their threats
Between 1560 and 1650, Europe experienced religious wars, revolutions and constitutional crises, economic and social disintegration and a witchcraft craze. It was truly an age of Crisis's.
The assassination started the diplomatic crisis that led to the outbreak of World War I. The Archduke was the heir to the throne of Austria-Hungary; Austria-Hungary blamed Serbians for helping with the assassination. After negotiations and ultimatums failed, Austria-Hungary declared war on Serbia, which set off a chain reaction of alliances that began the World War.
I am sorry but we can't answer because we don't know the statements that you were given as to the causes of the war.
* The Balkan Crisis * Alliances * Arms race * Militarism * Imperialism * Nationalism
Forming alliances increased the likelihood f war in Europe by pledging to go to each others aid in times of crisis, agreeing to protect smaller countries alllied to them, and creating a balance of power.
Cold War Alliances
There were many things happening in Europe in 1914 that led to the climate of crisis. The region was trying to operate under secret diplomacy with the United States. They were trying to militarize their countries and speed up the arms race. There was also unrest due to colonialism.
Eugene Newton Anderson has written: 'European issues in the twentieth century' -- subject(s): History 'Process versus power' 'Nineteenth century Europe, crisis and contribution' -- subject(s): History, Social classes 'Nationalism and the cultural crisis in Prussia, 1806-1815' -- subject(s): Nationalism, Prussia 'Europe in the nineteenth century' -- subject(s): Collections, History, Social conditions 'The Moroccan crisis, 1904-1906' -- subject(s): Moroccan Crisis, 1904-1906
The political climate of pre-World War I Europe saw a lot of diplomatic alliances being formed. So when Serbia and Austria-Hungary clashed, these alliances were called into action, and all of Europe was suddenly at war.
A national crisis.
the entente cordiale was strengthened
nothing ......... x0x0x0x0x0x0
The two crises of the early 20th century, particularly leading up to World War I, were deeply interconnected through imperialism, militarism, and nationalism. Imperialism fueled competition among European powers for colonies, intensifying rivalries and fostering alliances like the Triple Alliance and Triple Entente. Militarism contributed to an arms race, as nations built up their military capabilities in response to perceived threats, escalating tensions. Nationalism stirred fervent loyalty to one's nation, often at the expense of others, which propelled conflicts and alliances, ultimately culminating in the war.
It was dangerous because the alliances were large and if a war was to start i.e. World war 1, then all the alliances would be triggered creating a large scale war. It posed Nations being forced to be involved in another Nation's crisis.