In the North, there was a major boom, as the factories and farms were required to provide all manner of war supplies, and skilled immigrants continued to arrive from Europe.
In the South, it was mostly stagnation, with the Union naval blockade starving them of imports, and the Confederate dollar increasingly worthless.
If you consider slavery an economic policy, then it was over the morality of the south's economic policy
No. The Civil War was caused by economics and the invasion of the south by the north.
Thirty five years after the end of the US Civil War, the economics of the agricultural based South was in bad shape. By 1900, the main part of Southern economics, its farmlands, had only reached approximately 75% of the strength it had before the Civil War.
== ==
The spies were the cause of rumors of a military takeover of the Federal government in the US Civil War.
There is a civil war still going on today.
bob is cool
No. The Civil War was caused by economics and the invasion of the south by the north.
no it was already ruined
Olympic bombing, civil war, civil rights movement, coca cola was invented
Probably 60-40 on the side of economics.
sharecropping did not cause the civil war but it happened after when they couldnt have slaves anymore
you you you
Forced loans didn't cause the Civil War, they had very little to do with it.
The most significant cause in the Civil War was unfair taxation, states' rights and slavery.
secession was a part of the civil war. the south had succeededfrom the north.
Thirty five years after the end of the US Civil War, the economics of the agricultural based South was in bad shape. By 1900, the main part of Southern economics, its farmlands, had only reached approximately 75% of the strength it had before the Civil War.
yes