answersLogoWhite

0

Oh, dude, the harrying of the north was like William the Conqueror's way of saying, "Hey, I'm in charge now, deal with it." By devastating the north of England, he basically told the rebellious folks there, "You mess with me, you get the horns." It was a brutal way to establish control, but hey, it worked for him.

User Avatar

DudeBot

9mo ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

Who was harrying of the north?

The Harrying of the North was not a person. It was one of the ways that William I controlled England. William's army went up the the top half of England. It was very unpopular. For more information see: What was the Harrying of the North?


What were the campeigns in the harrying of the north?

Hereward the wake and the fens were rebelling on William


Where was the harrying of the north?

The harrying of the north took place in the north of England in the winter of 1069 and 1070.


Why was the harrying of the north a good solution?

The harrying of the north was seen as a solution by William the Conqueror to crush resistance and establish control over the region after the Norman Conquest of England. By devastating the countryside and destroying resources, William sought to break the spirit of the rebels and deter future uprisings. It was effective in suppressing dissent and solidifying Norman rule in Northern England.


What happened in 1069 in the north of England?

the harrying of the north people rebelled against william the conqueror so he killed them and burned the villages


When did the harrying of the north end?

the harrying of the north ended in 1071. This was when the people in the north of England stopped rebelling because William had killed 100,000, 10,000 of which starved to death because of the fact that William, Duke of Normandy burned down all their crops.


What did king William do in the harrying of the north?

nothing


What was the effect on England by the harrying of the north?

stuff


Rebels of harrying of the north?

The Harrying of the North was a series of brutal campaigns conducted by William the Conqueror in 1069-1070 to subdue northern England following a series of rebellions against Norman rule. The campaigns involved widespread destruction, including the burning of crops and villages, leading to severe famine and loss of life. This harsh response aimed to quell resistance and assert Norman control, ultimately solidifying William's power in the region. The Harrying had lasting effects on the population and landscape of northern England.


How did 'Harrying Of The North' help William keep control of England?

The Harrying of the North, which took place in 1069-70, was a brutal campaign by William the Conqueror aimed at suppressing rebellion in northern England. By devastating the land, destroying crops, and killing livestock, William instilled fear among the populace, effectively quelling resistance and deterring future uprisings. This harsh tactic demonstrated his military might and resolve, reinforcing his authority and control over the newly conquered territory. Ultimately, it solidified Norman dominance by breaking the spirit of opposition in the north.


What effects did the Harrying have?

The Harrying of the North, which occurred between 1069 and 1070, was a brutal campaign by William the Conqueror aimed at subduing the North of England following rebellions against Norman rule. It resulted in widespread destruction, including the burning of homes, crops, and livestock, leading to severe famine and loss of life. The campaign significantly weakened the resistance to Norman rule and solidified William's control over England, but it also fostered deep resentment among the Anglo-Saxon population. Ultimately, the Harrying contributed to long-term demographic and social changes in the region.


What was Williams brutal conquest of northern England called?

harrying of the north