The observation many historians make is that most people didn't notice any difference. But that assumes we consider the fall of Rome to have happened on a date or in some particular year. The fall of Rome was a long, drawn out process, in which things happened over periods of time, with certain events that gave dates to history.
There is a link below to an article describing this, but really, it is a subject on which many books have been written. According to the article, there are hundreds of reasons for the fall of Rome given by scholars, and there are many dates for the fall given by those who choose to give a date.
The fall of Rome. Rome had provided all the protection and services a society needed and when it was gone there was chaos.
Henry II and Thomas Becket fell out. (IDK what that means, but it was on a historical paper...)
The change was that they was looking for a water route from Europe to indies people and their life was change
dunnnoo
Julius Caesar
Newspapers did not exist. Paper reached Europe centuries after the Romans
The city of rome became less important.
Rome is in Europe. Its inhabitants were always predominantly European.
The fall of Rome. Rome had provided all the protection and services a society needed and when it was gone there was chaos.
the jeje fell off a tree when the abacus came to life in china
the jeje fell off a tree when the abacus came to life in china
this is not fun
harbored spices, silk, and ivory
It made something for the Europeans to trade with.
the east harbored spices, silk, and ivory.
Plague. Black Death.
What they have in common is the trade