Stalin had a saying that "quantity has a quality all it's own." There were probably only two nations on the earth at this time that could have stood up to the German invasion of the Soviet Union, and those were the Soviet Union or China.
The reason for this is that to defeat the Germans, one had to have massive amounts of bodies to wear them down. The Soviets lost between 20 to 40 million people fighting the Germans.
I do not know if there will ever be a truly accurate count of how many people died to stop the German attack. As I have said before no other country on the Allies side could have absorbed the losses that Stalin did and not surrender. To loose a quarter of a million soldiers, then half a million, and the loses continued to climb.
So quantity did overcome quality, but only because Hitler squandered the opportunities that his armed forces gave him. There were several times that the Germans could have seized the throat of the Soviet Union and did not
Both were extremely costly and bloody in terms of human life.However, okinawa was fought between the Americans and Japanese on pacific island.And Stalingrad was fought during the winter on the eurasian steppe between the Russians and Germans.
How did WHAT compare?
The US Civil War was fought against itself (brother against brother). The country of Israel fought other countries, unrelated to them.
The Luftwaffe was diverted to Russia in the summer of 1941. (Barbarossa) Initially the Germans were winning the battle, had they carried on attacking the sector airfields instead of bombing, principally, London, it is possible that Fighter Commands' main force would have needed to be diverted further north, had this happened then the British might not have been able to deny the Luftwaffe airspace in the effective way that they did. Having said all this the English Channel still appears to be an insurmountable obstacle for the Wehrmacht to cross. The answer to the question is that the Luftwaffe was losing the fight.
Nazi soldiers were tools of the state modern gangs are fighting against the state.
To compare an unknown quantity with a standard means to evaluate the unknown by measuring or examining it against a known or established reference point. This process helps to determine the value or characteristics of the unknown quantity in relation to the standard.
Russian aircraft in general are fairly crude compared to American and European examples
Yes, you can compare a known quantity with an unknown quantity in making measurements by using the known quantity as a reference point to determine the value of the unknown quantity. This comparison can help provide a basis for estimation or calculation in determining the value of the unknown quantity.
Velocity is a vectorial quantity, speed with a direction.
Yes. A pie chart is used to visually compare the parts of the whole.
industrialized nations use more energy
To measure a physical quantity correctly and need to compare it with some standard quantities. Thus a standard unit is needed to measure a quantity correctly.
They followed the same blueprint for failure. Both failed to defeat the Russians.
If the demand shift to the right, the equilibrium price and quantity will shift from the initial equilibrium price and quantity to the next, i mean the equilibrium price and quantity will increase as compare to the first.
In the long term, a quantity that grows exponentially will ALWAYS get larger, eventually, than a quantity that grows linearly, quadratically, or in fact, than any polynomial - basically, a quantity raised to any finite power, such as x cubed, x to the 20th power, etc.
Both were extremely costly and bloody in terms of human life.However, okinawa was fought between the Americans and Japanese on pacific island.And Stalingrad was fought during the winter on the eurasian steppe between the Russians and Germans.
Germans are have blue eyes and speak English. japan have chinky eyes and speak Japanese.