They didn't really travel because they lived under strict Dictatorship by there Lord. Also they lived inside a Manor witch is like a very small village, so there wasn't very many long travels.
Serfs were bound to the land.Best of luck to A+Serfs are bound to the land. A+
The serfs were tied to the land they lived on and farmed.
Serfs owed crops to their lords.Apex.
The serfs belonged to the poor class.
Serfs were slaves who were owned by nobles.
In the Middle Ages serfs traveled on foot, by ox drawn carts and boats. If there were lucky they would travel on horses.
Serfs in Europe were not allowed to leave the manor which they were tied to unless given permission by their lord. If they were caught leaving they were severely punished. Does this mean none of them traveled at all? Of course not and I'm sure there are instances of escape to freedom. As a whole however, serfs did not really travel. Have they "ever traveled" yeah, of course. If I could think of an instance of mass travelling serfs, at least widely, I'd think of indentured servants. While these were not serfs, they came to America and essentially became serfs who payed their passage to the Americas by working for seven years. They were pretty much slaves, just like serfs.
Serfs were bound to the land.Best of luck to A+Serfs are bound to the land. A+
Serfs are Islamic
Serfs were bound to the land.Best of luck to A+Serfs are bound to the land. A+
There are no serfs in Russia today.
Serfs were barely above slaves themselves. I doubt any serfs ever owned slaves.
Serfs owed crops to their lords.Apex.
The serfs were tied to the land they lived on and farmed.
When Alexander II freed the serfs (peasants) in Russia in 1861. The serfs were never truly freed. The Russian government bought land from the landowners to give to the serfs, but the serfs were required to repay the Russian government. These repayments took 49 years and the serfs stayed on the land until it was fully repaid.
How could the Crusades change a serfs’ life?
The serfs belonged to the poor class.