Yes
It didnt really affect the war that much. the attack was to small to affect it very much.
if the romainains won they could sent suplys to the Germans in Stalingrad
Japan would surrender thus ending World War 2
The most obvious outcome was that England was not invaded by the Spanish and went on to become the most prominent sea-faring nation in the world over the following 200 years.
it didnt
lazaj jubbi frist they fight for the world
North Carolina affected the outcome of WW2 by purchacing tons of federal stamps and by training troops.
Yes
It didnt really affect the war that much. the attack was to small to affect it very much.
if the romainains won they could sent suplys to the Germans in Stalingrad
They were surprised, upset that they were doing that over something really stupid
Japan would surrender thus ending World War 2
it ended the war. Japan surrendered without conditions.
The most obvious outcome was that England was not invaded by the Spanish and went on to become the most prominent sea-faring nation in the world over the following 200 years.
No, sonar didn't affect the outcome of World War I. Sonar and electronics technology were not far enough advanced to make a difference in the era from 1910 to 1920. Certainly the war spurred the efforts to develop sonar, but it didn't come far enough fast enough to have any significant effect on WWI at all. A link is provided to the Wikipedia article on sonar, and the section on "History" is brief and easy to read. Why not surf on over and check it out? Our friends there supply knowledge for free.
Many of the battles of World War I were fought with hundreds of thousands of troops on each side. Some of these battles were at Ardennes, Belleau Woods, the Somme, Gallipoli, Ypres, Kut, Bazentin Ridge, Samarrah, Chateau-Thierry, and Passchendaele.