Some would conclude that it was poorly done at best. The Wilmot Proviso was introduced but failed twice in the US Senate. Popular soverignty was the result and that option was not acceptable to the Abolitionists.
..banned slavery in all the new territories acquired from Mexico.
South ofthat line, slavery was allowed. But it only applied to the territories acquired from France in the Louisiana Purchase of 1803. When the USA acquired vast new lands from Mexico in 1847, a new compromise had to be worked out, in view of the Wilmot Proviso, which declared that no slavery should be allowed in any of these new territories.
slavery in the territory acquired from Mexico
The intent of the Wilmot Proviso was to not allow slavery in the new US territories. In 1846, US President Polk asked Congress to appropriate $2 million for expenses related to the war against Mexico. Congressman David Wilmot attached an amendment to this appropriations bill. Wilmot was a fellow party member of President Polk.
No - there was no slavery in the new territories - California or New Mexico or Utah. Texas was a slave state already.
The extension of slavery into territories acquired from mexico
It declared that there should be no slavery allowed in any of the new territories acquired from Mexico.
Former Mexican territories were supposed to ban slavery, except Texas. This was defined ion the Wilmot Proviso (1846). However, it was not enforced, and caused further divisions between pro-slavery states and the North. It resulted in the American Civil War (1861-1865).
The Wilmot Proviso was designed to outlaw slavery in territories acquired from the War of Mexico. One of the effects was a political party that became dedicated to stopping the spread of slavery.
The Wilmot Proviso called for banning slavery in territories acquired from Mexico during the Mexican-American War. It aimed to prevent the spread of slavery into these new territories.
..banned slavery in all the new territories acquired from Mexico.
David Wilmot wanted slavery prohibited in territories acquired from Mexico in order to prevent the spread of slavery into new territories, as he believed that allowing slavery to expand would only further entrench the institution in the United States. This proposal, known as the Wilmot Proviso, aimed to preserve the western territories for free labor and was part of the broader political debates surrounding the expansion of slavery in the mid-19th century.
The Wilmot Proviso, which declared that slavery should not be allowed in any of the new territories acquired from Mexico.
Manifest destiny and slavery on acquired territories (specially Texas) motivated such conquest. See related questions.
Slavery would be legal there. But this did not apply to the new territories that were later acquired from Mexico.
South ofthat line, slavery was allowed. But it only applied to the territories acquired from France in the Louisiana Purchase of 1803. When the USA acquired vast new lands from Mexico in 1847, a new compromise had to be worked out, in view of the Wilmot Proviso, which declared that no slavery should be allowed in any of these new territories.
Southerners disagreed with the Wilmot Proviso because it sought to ban slavery in any territories acquired from Mexico during the Mexican-American War. They believed that the federal government should not have the power to restrict the expansion of slavery into new territories, as it would upset the balance between free and slave states in the Union.