answersLogoWhite

0

Some would conclude that it was poorly done at best. The Wilmot Proviso was introduced but failed twice in the US Senate. Popular soverignty was the result and that option was not acceptable to the Abolitionists.

User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

Following the Mexican-American War which issue broke party unity and divided Congress largely along sectional lines?

The extension of slavery into territories acquired from mexico


What does the wilmont proviso say?

It declared that there should be no slavery allowed in any of the new territories acquired from Mexico.


What was the issue of slavery decided in the territory ceded by Mexico?

Former Mexican territories were supposed to ban slavery, except Texas. This was defined ion the Wilmot Proviso (1846). However, it was not enforced, and caused further divisions between pro-slavery states and the North. It resulted in the American Civil War (1861-1865).


What was the effect of the wilmot proviso?

The Wilmot Proviso was designed to outlaw slavery in territories acquired from the War of Mexico. One of the effects was a political party that became dedicated to stopping the spread of slavery.


What did wil mot proviso call for?

The Wilmot Proviso called for banning slavery in territories acquired from Mexico during the Mexican-American War. It aimed to prevent the spread of slavery into these new territories.


What would the Wilmot Proviso do if it had passed?

..banned slavery in all the new territories acquired from Mexico.


Why did David Wilmot wanted slavery prohibited in territories acquired from which country?

David Wilmot wanted slavery prohibited in territories acquired from Mexico in order to prevent the spread of slavery into new territories, as he believed that allowing slavery to expand would only further entrench the institution in the United States. This proposal, known as the Wilmot Proviso, aimed to preserve the western territories for free labor and was part of the broader political debates surrounding the expansion of slavery in the mid-19th century.


What did pre civil war abolitionists support?

The Wilmot Proviso, which declared that slavery should not be allowed in any of the new territories acquired from Mexico.


How was out conquest of Mexico partially fueled by racism?

Manifest destiny and slavery on acquired territories (specially Texas) motivated such conquest. See related questions.


What did the Missouri Compromise say about the states below the 36 degree parallel?

Slavery would be legal there. But this did not apply to the new territories that were later acquired from Mexico.


What about slavery below south of the line in Missouri compromise?

South ofthat line, slavery was allowed. But it only applied to the territories acquired from France in the Louisiana Purchase of 1803. When the USA acquired vast new lands from Mexico in 1847, a new compromise had to be worked out, in view of the Wilmot Proviso, which declared that no slavery should be allowed in any of these new territories.


Why did the southerners disagree with the wilmot proviso?

Southerners disagreed with the Wilmot Proviso because it sought to ban slavery in any territories acquired from Mexico during the Mexican-American War. They believed that the federal government should not have the power to restrict the expansion of slavery into new territories, as it would upset the balance between free and slave states in the Union.