0
How did the north and south felt about the fugitive slave act and the Kansas-Nebraska Act?
Both these Acts polarised the two sections, and brought war closer.
The Fugitive Slave Act obliged all members of the public to report anyone who looked though they might be a runaway, on pain of a heavy fine. The South was delighted at this endorsement of slave power, but the North strongly resented being treated as unpaid slave-catchers, and Harriet Beecher Stowe felt so strongly about it that she wrote 'Uncle Tom' Cabin'.
The Kansas-Nebraska Act was a hopeful attempt to put the slavery question to the vote in each newly-created state of the Union. The South was pleased, because this could allow for new slave-states. Most of the North did not have strong feelings about it, though the Abolitionist lobby was outraged.
But the bully-boys from both sides saw the opportunity for invading this thinly-populated territory, intimidating voters and disrupting the polls. The result was 'Bleeding Kansas', an obvious curtain-raiser for the oncoming war.
What else can I help you with?
How did the North feel about the Fugitive Slave Laws?
North dislike The Fugitive Slave Law, because that did not support slavery, and therefore did not want to send escaped slaves back to the south. North brought the slavery issue to their own doorstep , and gave the runawys a heroic victim status.
Where the north and south mad at the fugitive slave law?
The South wasn't mad at the Fugutive Slave Law - the law was introduced to appease them when Congress allowed California to enter the Union as free soil. It was the North who reacted badly to the law - it brought the slavery issue to their own doorstep, and gave the runaways a heroic victim status.
Why is the Fugitive Slave act so significant in the movement towards abolitionism?
The Fugitive Slave Act was so significant in the North's trend towards abolitionism because it gave people personal reasons to despise the South's slave system. As part of the Compromise of 1850 (I believe), the only real concession that the South received was the Fugitive Slave Act, which was a federal mandate that allowed southern slave catchers to go into the free North to recapture runaway slaves. Northerners were outraged by this, because not only did they feel that their privacy was being violated, but sometimes free blacks were taken off the streets and whisked away into southern slavery. In retaliation, Northern states retaliated with personal resistance, and even state laws, in order to make the slave catchers' job as difficult as possible (the ironic part about the state laws was that they essentially "nullified" federal law, which the South was notorious for). The North's public backlash against the Fugitive Slave Act led many to evolve abolitionist sentiments, and abolitionists transitioned from being a radical outside voice to becoming a dominant idea of Northern thinking.
Did Robert smalls fought for the north or south?
He was a slave for the south.
How did the Fugitive Slave Act and the Dred Scott decision affect formerly enslaved African Americans living in the North?
The Dred Scott stated African Americans were property and had no rights. Even in northern states they could be considered property and had no rights. The fugitive slave act virtually gave permission for the men who were hired to bring back slaves to find a free slave as a replacement to take south. They didn't care if he/she was in the north or free. Either way they were paid for bodies returned.
Did the new Fugitive Slave Act appeal to the North or the South?
South
How did the fugitive slave act effect the north south and the African Americans?
it to away their natural rights
What did the north and south want for the fugitive slave act?
The North wanted more leniency and protection for fugitive slaves, while the South wanted stricter enforcement and harsher penalties for those helping slaves escape. The Fugitive Slave Act of 1850 was part of the Compromise of 1850 in an attempt to address the growing tensions over slavery in the United States.
How did the North feel about the Fugitive Slave Laws?
North dislike The Fugitive Slave Law, because that did not support slavery, and therefore did not want to send escaped slaves back to the south. North brought the slavery issue to their own doorstep , and gave the runawys a heroic victim status.
What are the effects of the Fugitive Slave law?
The fugitive slave law stated that all slaves who escaped to the north could be recaptured and brought back to their owners in the south. The people in the north were very unhappy about this. The fugitive slave law was one of the main causes of the Civil War.
How did the fugitive slave act cause tension between the north and south?
The Fugitive Slave Act required the return of escaped slaves to their owners, increasing tensions as many in the North opposed the practice of slavery. It also empowered slave catchers to capture fugitive slaves in free states, leading to backlash from abolitionists and free-state residents who resisted enforcement of the law. This deepened the divide between the North and South over the issue of slavery and states' rights.
What did the north want in the fugitive slave law?
To appease the South, so that California could be admitted to the Union as free soil.
Why was the fugitive slave law unpopular in the north?
It was unpopular in the north because they did not support slavery, and therefore did not want to send escaped slaves back to the south
How did personal liberty laws increase tension between the north and the south over the fugitive slave act?
Some northern states used personal liberty laws to nullify the figitive slave Act, written to help the south.
How did the fugitive slave laws impact the north?
to appease tht south so that california could be admitted to the union as free soil .
Why did the south not like the fugitive slave act?
The South did not like the Fugitive Slave Act because it faced resistance in free states, where some citizens opposed returning escaped slaves to their owners. This opposition disrupted the enforcement of the law and hindered the South's efforts to reclaim runaway slaves.
How did the Personal Liberty Law in the US increase tensions between the North and South over the Fugitives Slave Act?
The Personal Liberty Laws were state laws passed in Northern states in response to the Fugitive Slave Act. These laws aimed to protect the rights of free blacks and fugitive slaves from being captured and returned to the South. By undermining the enforcement of the Fugitive Slave Act, the Personal Liberty Laws exacerbated tensions between the North and South by challenging federal authority and the institution of slavery.
