0
What else can I help you with?
Who supported the Dred Scott decision?
the south because the case said that slaves were definitly not citizens
Did the supreme court declare Scott as a free man?
The US Supreme Court decision on the Dred Scott case resulted in the court making it clear that Scott could not be a free man and denied his case to be free of his slavery status. The Court declared that Scott was not a US citizen, and thus could not sue for his freedom.
How did the Dred Scott v. Sandford case contribute to the outbreak of the Civil War?
The Dred Scott v. Sandford case contributed to the outbreak of the Civil War by ruling that African Americans were not considered citizens and therefore did not have the right to sue in federal court. This decision heightened tensions between the North and South over the issue of slavery and states' rights, ultimately fueling the conflict that led to the Civil War.
How did the nation respond to the Dred Scott Supreme Court decision?
The Dred Scott decision by the US Supreme Court weakened the case for those Americans that believed slavery had to be abolished. It strengthened the belief, held mostly in the South, that slavery was Constitutional. The South was elated, and Northerners who opposed slavery were shocked.
Is a slave free if he moved into a free territory?
This was quite a sticky issue before the Civil War. The most famous legal battle over this was the Supreme Court case Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857). Dred Scott was a slave who traveled with his master into Illinois, where slavery was illegal. Upon returning to Missouri, where it was legal, Scott sued his master for his freedom. The case eventually made it to SCOTUS, where Scott lost in a 7-2 decision, ultimately meaning that a slave could not be declared free if moved into a free territory. The case is considered by some to be the worst decision ever made by SCOTUS.
How did the abolitionists react to the supreme courts decision in the Dred Scott case?
Abolitionists were outraged by the Supreme Court's decision in the Dred Scott case, as it ruled that African Americans, whether free or enslaved, were not citizens and therefore did not have the right to sue in federal court. They saw this decision as a setback to the abolitionist movement and a reinforcement of the institution of slavery.
The decision in the Dred Scott case was that .?
Scott was a slave and could not bring suit
What was decision in the dred Scott case was that?
Scott was a slave and could not win suit.
What decision in the dred Scott case was that .?
Scott was a slave and could not win suit.
How did Dred Scott CASE affect the civil war?
The Dred Scott Decision helped lead to the Civil War because it caused fighting between the North and South. The North was angry because people in the north had decided not to allow slavery in their states, and the Dred Scott decision allowed slaves to be brought into their states. The Dred Scott decision basically said that if a slave was brought to a free state they were still a slave because they were property. so even a free state wasn't really free. Most southerners were happy with the decision because it allowed them to take slaves with them to free states and territories and reinforced the idea that slaves had no rights as U.S. citizens. Dred Scott's case caused more trouble between the North and South.
Does this case remain relevant during Dred Scott v Sandford case?
No, the 14th Amendment supersedes the Dred Scott decision.
What was the name of the chief justice in the decision dred Scott case?
The chief justice in the Dred Scott case was Roger B. Taney.
What was the judges decision in the Dred Scott Case?
it made slavery and the western territory
Why were many southerners pleased by the court's decision in the Dred Scott case?
Because the Supreme Court ruled he was still a slave even though his owner died. The North was upset by that.
What supreme court decision divided the nationall even more?
Dred Scott case
What precedent was established by the decision in Dred Scott v Sanford?
The finding in the Dred Scott vs Sanford case was tha when a slave master took a slave tho the north, the slave was notautomaticaly freed and furthermore that slaves were not people, but property.
What court case said that slaves were property not people?
The Dred Scott v. Sandford case in 1857 ruled that slaves were property, not citizens, and therefore could not bring a case to court. The decision further deepened the divide between the North and South on the issue of slavery.
