The social contract theory posits that individuals consent to form a government to protect their rights and ensure social order. When a government fails to uphold its end of the contract, violating the rights of the people, the social contract justifies rebellion as a means to restore justice and reclaim personal freedoms. Philosophers like john Locke argued that individuals have the right to revolt against oppressive regimes, asserting that the legitimacy of government is derived from the consent of the governed. Thus, if a government becomes tyrannical, citizens are morally and ethically justified in seeking to overthrow it.
It justified the right to revolt against a government, that no longer guaranteed the man's natural and inalienable rights
Colonists used Enlightenment ideals to justify their rebellion against British rule by emphasizing concepts such as natural rights, social contracts, and the pursuit of liberty. Thinkers like John Locke argued that individuals have inherent rights to life, liberty, and property, and that governments derive their legitimacy from the consent of the governed. When the British government imposed taxes and laws without representation, colonists viewed this as a violation of their rights, leading them to assert that they had the right to overthrow a government that no longer served their interests. This philosophical framework provided a moral and intellectual foundation for their quest for independence.
cock
King George III had violated the rights of the Americans; therefore, they had the right to overthrow the government.
We went to war for freedom. The colonist wanted independence.
no
It justified the right to revolt against a government, that no longer guaranteed the man's natural and inalienable rights
By naming pork after himself
The group you are referring to is likely the Taiping Rebellion in mid-19th century China. Led by Hong Xiuquan, the movement combined elements of Christianity with Chinese religious beliefs to justify their rebellion against the ruling Qing Dynasty.
legal authority over colonies
The theory of justifying a monarch's rule by God's authority is called the Divine Right of Kings. It was a political and religious doctrine that asserted a monarch's legitimacy and absolute authority as being granted by God. This theory was commonly used in Europe during the medieval and early modern periods to support the monarchy's power and to discourage rebellion against the ruler.
Your mom is how he did it
wa
he was arrested by the metis and then he tried to escape and injured a metis officer ! He then threatened to kill members of the government if he was released, which is what the government wanted to do. That lead to a conviction of treason and eventually his execution. In death he was used by Canada to vilify the provisional government, call their actions those of a rebellion, and justify their military domination of a British Colony located within their recently acquired Rupert's Land.
Colonists used Enlightenment ideals to justify their rebellion against British rule by emphasizing concepts such as natural rights, social contracts, and the pursuit of liberty. Thinkers like John Locke argued that individuals have inherent rights to life, liberty, and property, and that governments derive their legitimacy from the consent of the governed. When the British government imposed taxes and laws without representation, colonists viewed this as a violation of their rights, leading them to assert that they had the right to overthrow a government that no longer served their interests. This philosophical framework provided a moral and intellectual foundation for their quest for independence.
It states it real good, it basic says that it demands that you either support are decision or we will go to war.
Dam mit I'm mad