Kings typically viewed serfs as a vital part of their agricultural economy, often treating them as property rather than individuals with rights. While serfs were obligated to work the land and provide a share of their produce, they were often subject to harsh living conditions and limited freedoms. In return for their labor, serfs received protection and access to land, but their status was largely one of subservience and dependence on their lord's goodwill. The relationship could vary depending on the ruler's policies and the specific socio-economic context of the time.
the vassals are the kings slaves and the serfs are like a nun and monks
During the middle ages serfs worked for their lords and that is who protected them.
the feudal system for serfs was a bad thing because they always had to do work for the kings,lord and/or knights.
Nobles were against the creation of guilds and allowing serfs to pay with goods rather than labor.
Kings & Queens were the Highest-ranking class in the Medieval Times. They weren't as rich as Nobles (sadly to say...) but they controled ALL the power over the land and lived in castles with serfs and servants.
the vassals are the kings slaves and the serfs are like a nun and monks
During the middle ages serfs worked for their lords and that is who protected them.
From the Kings/or slave owner.
lords,ladies,kings,cooks and maybe serfs
It varied. Some kings were kind people who tried to improve the lives of their subjects, and others were not.
The peasants or serfs did the farming
Serfs, peasants, villeins.
Kings and Queens and they would keep serfs in it too if in danger
Kings and lords owned the land and peasants called serfs, so lords and kings had all the power.
At the very bottom. They had no freedom and no one below them.
Serfs can cut down trees.
the lords, knights, kings, queens, serfs, and freemen got it the best