Asoka, the Indian emperor of the Maurya Dynasty, is often seen as a ruthless conqueror due to his early military campaigns, particularly the Kalinga War, which resulted in massive casualties and suffering. His relentless pursuit of territorial expansion showcased his ambition and willingness to use brutal force to achieve his goals. However, this ruthlessness transformed into a commitment to non-violence and Buddhism after witnessing the horrors of war, leading him to advocate for peace and compassion in his later reign.
yes, he was ruthless and powerful, he was strong too. He did this so people would not rebel against him and illustrate to his people that he was stronger and more powerful (not everyone accepted him).
He was a bad leader because he killed a lot of his citizens on the road to war and after the Battle of Hastings. Almost all Monarchs were ruthless killers and didn't care how many people they killed.
King Ashoka is often referred to as the "Sage King" due to his transformation from a ruthless conqueror to a benevolent ruler after the Kalinga War. Following the devastation of the conflict, he embraced Buddhism and advocated for non-violence, compassion, and moral governance. His efforts to promote social welfare, religious tolerance, and the spread of Buddhist teachings earned him a reputation as a wise and enlightened ruler, embodying the principles of dharma. This significant shift in his leadership style and philosophy solidified his legacy as a sage-like figure in history.
because asoka was a ruler
Asoka was king of Holland in the 12th Century B.C.E.
This document provides insights into Ashoka's policies and actions during his reign, highlighting both his military conquests and subsequent transformation into a proponent of Buddhism and non-violence. It details the harsh methods he employed to expand his empire, juxtaposed with his later emphasis on moral governance and welfare. By examining these contrasting aspects, the document helps to frame Ashoka as a complex figure who evolved from a ruthless conqueror to an enlightened ruler dedicated to peace and ethical leadership.
Asoka was the name of the king who spread Buddhism.
yes, he was ruthless and powerful, he was strong too. He did this so people would not rebel against him and illustrate to his people that he was stronger and more powerful (not everyone accepted him).
My opinion on Asoka is that he was not a ruthless prince/leader. He was in fact very thoughtful and cared for when people was in need. Asoka was prince/ruler of the Mauryan Empire. Asoka had a serious side of him. He also had a spiritual and nature side too. He changed his religion to Buddhist and made his way to spread religious beliefs throughout the country. Asoka also sent missionaries which are groups of people that passed a royal message. Asoka was not a ruthless leader. He helped people when they were in need, sent missionaries and carved edicts on stone pillars. Asoka sent missionaries to kingdoms of southern India, to parts of Kashmir, etc. But, as Christians were to learn, old habits are not easily broken. Buddhism outside his kingdom took root only on island of Shri Lanka. With Asoka's Buddhism there was little change regarding work, taxation, class relations, government bureaucracy and village politics. His teachings were meant to strengthen association of family and existing social classes. He wanted to make up for all his chilling errors from Kalinga war so he reversed his path and forgot about the past. Asoka promises to care for his people. He promises neighboring people that they need not fear him; he will use only encouragement, not violence, to win people over. Asoka notes that he has made available fruit trees for people, as well as medical care for all people and animals. In addition, Asoka was very concerned with judicial matters. He banned punishments such as torture and death penalty. Asoka took pride in righteousness and goodwill according to Nehru. He worked hard in public business. He labored hard at self-improvement and always wanted the best for his country. He adored people's medical health. *The first of a few reasons why Asoka was a rightful ruler is because He gave gifts to the poor, he rejected the path of violence, and he consulted local communities about proper governance. it says that a monk told him [Asoka] to sit beneath the Bodhi tree, where he found enlightenment and did all these things. But he can be ruthless because he stayed on the wrong path for a very long time. Although he gave mercy and kindness to his people.
A ruthless conqueror. A benevolent dictator. A man with a mission to bring civilisation and prosperity to a region riven by war and degradation.
This question comes down to opinions. Some people think he was but others argue that he brought safety to the countries he ruled because of his army.
The conqueror excluded from the monk's parables is Alexander the Great. He chose to mention brutal and ruthless conquerors like Attila the Hun and Genghis Khan as cautionary tales of power and its consequences, while omitting Alexander due to his philosophy of assimilation and cultural exchange.
He was a bad leader because he killed a lot of his citizens on the road to war and after the Battle of Hastings. Almost all Monarchs were ruthless killers and didn't care how many people they killed.
Asoka Mehta was born in 1911.
Ruthless is an adjective.
Asoka Tano
because asoka was buddha