All of the Pals Battalions died in world war 1 but 1 of them survived called Mr T.Akins
In the related links box below, I posted a site about the The Accrington Pals.
By 1976, regiments were no longer standing formations in the Army, and were retained more for the purpose of lineage. How many companies a regiment had depended on how many battalions of the regiment were still standing.. it could be one, it could be more. It also depended on how those battalions were structured.
There are 1000's of schoools in Scotland.
No. Neither is there any overall list of all who were awarded the Medal. Division commanders had the authority to award the Silver Star; higher awards had to be approved by higher authority. Many divisions and some regiments published unit histories immediately after the war, and these often include lists of unit members who were decorated. There were a lot of smaller "independent" battalions of various types which were not a part of any larger formation, and these, being so small, usually did not publish a history. Many times these independent battalions were attached, more or less permanently, to a particular division, and MIGHT be included in that division's history, if it published one. All the tank battalions (numbered in the 700s), all the tank destroyer battalions, all the anti-aircraft artillery were independent battalions. There were three or four independent battalions of combat engineers who turned in heroic performances during the Bulge.
All of the Pals Battalions died in world war 1 but 1 of them survived called Mr T.Akins
liverpool
because they fought in the war
Pals battalions were specially constituted units of the British army. General Sir Henry Rawlinson suggested that men would be more willing to enlist in the Army if they knew that they were going to serve alongside their friends. He appealed to London stockbrokers to raise a battalion of men from workers in the City of London to set an example. 1600 men enlisted in the 10th (Service) Bn Royal Fusiliers, the so-called "Stockbrokers' Battalion", within a week in late August 1914. Lots of people went on to make pals battalions like Liverpool and Kitchener promoted the idea of organizing similar recruitment campaign. By the end of September 1914, over fifty towns had formed Pals battalions, whilst the larger towns and cities were able to form several battalions. Several battalions suffered heavy casualties during the Somme offensives of 1916. With the introduction of conscription in January 1916, further Pals battalions were not sought. Most pal battalions were decimated by the end of 1917/ start of 1918
Pals battalions, formed during World War I, allowed groups of friends and communities to enlist together, fostering camaraderie and boosting recruitment. The advantages included enhanced morale and a strong sense of unity among soldiers. However, the disadvantages became apparent when these battalions suffered heavy casualties, leading to significant losses in entire communities and emotional devastation for families. Additionally, the reliance on such units sometimes compromised military effectiveness, as they lacked the diverse skill sets found in mixed battalions.
When men from a small area decided to enlist, it was difficult not to enlist too, without being ridiculed or called a coward. The main disadvantage was that whole boys battalions could be wiped out on the battlefield. Many villages and city areas suddenly found that a whole generation was no longer there.
Pals Battalions were military units formed during World War I, consisting of men who enlisted together from the same communities, workplaces, or social groups. This approach aimed to boost recruitment by fostering a sense of camaraderie and solidarity among friends and neighbors. However, the tactic had devastating consequences, as entire communities suffered losses when these battalions were decimated in battle. The concept highlighted the personal impact of the war on local populations and contributed to the broader narrative of collective grief.
We are all familiar with the view that the idea of 'Pals' Battalions was a badly conceived idea which ultimately resulted in tragedies where men joined together, served together and died together and whole communities had their menfolk wiped out on a single day. This is, it seems, all wrapped up in the same folk memory of incompetent generals, 'lions led by donkeys' etc etc Is there a counterargument to this? Without wishing in any way to ignore the loss to local communities, wasn't the idea of locally raised Pals battalions just an extension of the tradition of 'county regiments' supplemented by local territorial groups and, at the time, was there an alternative when the army had to be expanded so quickly? Would there have been the facilities to train men away from their local area and then organise battalions in a different way? The logistics sound horrendous. So was there an alternative, given the circumstances in 1914? Would the British Army have been able to expand so quickly using another, better method? And is there any evidence to suggest the 'Pals' Battalions were more or less efficient fighting units by, say, 1st July 1916 than other non-regular units. Or that the tactics used by the generals differed depending on whether the units to be used were 'Pals' or not?
Pal's Battalions were units in the British Army during the first world war. It's basic idea was that people could be enlisted in local recruiting drives in order to fight with their family, friends, etc. The word "pal" meaning friend in British English (:
"Pals" battalions in the British Army were formed as part of the effort to keep men enlisting, thus avoiding the need for conscription (a "draft"). The early pre-war British professional army was soon shot to pieces in the first few battles, and a much larger new force was needed right away. Posters appeared all over England of a bristling-moustachioed Field Marshal Kitchener, glaring out and pointing at the viewer, informing that viewer that Kitchener wanted YOU. So men volunteered for "Kitchener's Mob", and to induce them to do so these Pals battalions became a thing, allowing men from the same town, or from the same trade or profession in larger cities, to enlist to serve together (there was even a battalion of accountants from London). This proved to be not such a good idea when "Kitchener's Mob" with its many Pals battalions first went into heavy action on the Somme, July 1, 1916. It made for a very, very bad day in many towns and villages, as all their boys were shot up at the same time. Unsurprisingly, enlistment soon slowed to a trickle as well, and the British had to resort to conscription after all, after the war had been going on for about a year and a half. See related links below for more information on the Bradford Pals.
4 qualds
There are 4 brigades in a division. Each brigade has 6 battalions in it (2 infantry battalions, 1 artillery battalion, 1 BSB, 1 BSTB, and 1 Cavalry battalion) so to answer your question in a standard division there are 24 battalions