answersLogoWhite

0

Less than 20% of the Southern population owned African Americans. There are many misconceptions as to what caused and fueled the American Civil War. Slavery was indeed one of them. Increased tariffs on products shipped to northern ports was a significant one. Really significant was the South's secession from the union and voting its own President which angered Northerners greatly. It was a major investment to own an African American especially if they possessed valuable skills such as blacksmithing, carpentry, or farming skills. Certainly owning a black man or woman, was a prestigious classification, but very few Southerners and Northerners, fit in this category of wealth. Thus, the stories that have been perpetuated throughout history of all slave owners beating their "slaves" is quite inaccurate. It is a myth that the media of that time stimulated to build a case to send the North and South to war. In addition, politicians, many of them wealthy and slave-owners, were used as the example or model for the Southern population, when in fact the average Southerner lived day to day and could not afford to purchase another human being for $500-$1,500 .

In addition, while many people have been taught that Southerners were the only ones who owned African Americans in the United States, Northern sentiment was possibly even more harsh toward African Americans. Blacks were beaten and even killed in city streets of New York City, New York, toward dissolvement in the mid to late 1800's, but it was the American Civil War which sped up the abolition.

It depends heavily on the region. South Carolina had the largest percentage of the population who owned slaves. Areas of the coastal plain, which are areas within about 100-200 miles inland, were flat, fertile, sunny, and had the subtropical climate where cotton and especially rice thrive. Cotton and rice were sold and shipped to various ports, including Boston. Combined with the labor intensity of growing cotton and rice, farms growing them usually had slaves. Note that Africans had previously grown rice in Africa, so they were accustomed to the process. Areas in the mountains, as well as wooded, undeveloped areas (then called back woods), on the other hand, had few, if any, slaves.

User Avatar

Wiki User

10y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

How many southerners owned 100 or more slaves in 1860?

798


How many southerners owned 20 or more slave?

How many southerners owned 20 or more slaves


How many Republicans owned slaves in 1860?

In 1860, about 12 of Republicans in the United States owned slaves.


How many whites owned slaves in 1860?

25% of southern white families owned slaves in 1860


How many white southerners owned slaves?

fewer than 4%


How many slave owners were there in 1860?

1,900,000 of whom: 1,400,000 owned from 1 to 10 slaves, 300,000 owned from10 to 20 slaves, 200,000 owned more than 20 slaves.


How many slaves did most southerners own?

few or no enslaved people at all


How many southerners owned 500 or more slave?

only 11 held 500 or more slaves


How many southern families had slaves before the Civil War?

About 25-30% of white southern families owned slaves on the eve of the Civil War.


How many owned slaves in the south in 1860?

About 2 million were in the south. Which was 20% of the whole population.


How many slaves were in Georgia in 1860?

There were around 3,950,000 slaves in Georgia in 1860.


How many slaves did a slaveholder own have in 1860?

In 1860, the average slaveholder in the United States owned about four slaves. However, the number of slaves owned varied widely, with some slaveholders owning none and others, particularly large plantation owners, possessing hundreds. Approximately 25% of all white families in the South owned slaves, but the majority were small-scale slaveholders. Overall, there were about 4 million enslaved people in the U.S. at that time.