Legitimate authority occurs when people use power for good and have acquired power by proper and honest means. When people perceive an attempt at influence as legitimate, they recognize it and willingly comply.
Iran, Saudi Arabia... Take your pick.
Jonathan Edwards emphasizes that the power of kings is ultimately subordinate to God's sovereignty. In his view, earthly rulers may wield authority, but their power is limited and contingent upon divine will. Edwards argues that true authority comes from God, and kings should govern in accordance with moral righteousness and justice as dictated by divine law. Ultimately, he highlights the transient nature of human power compared to God's eternal authority.
The power of an emperor can vary significantly based on historical context, cultural norms, and the specific governance structure of their empire. In absolute monarchies, emperors may wield extensive authority over political, military, and economic matters, often ruling by decree. In constitutional monarchies, their powers are typically ceremonial and symbolic, with real political authority resting in elected bodies. Ultimately, the extent of an emperor's power is shaped by the legal framework and societal expectations of their time.
Rulers with total authority are often referred to as autocrats or dictators. They wield absolute power over a state or organization, making decisions without legal constraints or democratic processes. Such leaders may suppress dissent, control the media, and limit political freedoms to maintain their grip on power. Examples include historical figures like Joseph Stalin or modern leaders in authoritarian regimes.
Conflicts can arise between parties with legitimate interests in a project due to differing priorities, resource allocation, and decision-making authority. For example, stakeholders may have competing objectives, such as maximizing profit versus ensuring sustainability. Additionally, miscommunication or lack of transparency can lead to misunderstandings and mistrust, further complicating collaboration. Balancing these diverse interests often requires effective negotiation and conflict resolution strategies.
An influence attempt based on legitimate power is most likely to result in compliance from the target. This is because legitimate power stems from a recognized authority or position, leading individuals to follow directives due to respect for that authority. However, the depth of commitment may vary, as compliance does not necessarily equate to genuine agreement or enthusiasm for the action requested. Ultimately, while legitimate power can effectively elicit a response, it may not foster lasting influence or motivation.
The legitimacy of power often depends on the context in which it is exercised and the perceptions of those subject to it. Legitimate power is typically derived from accepted authority, laws, or social norms, and is recognized by the governed as rightful. However, if power is maintained through coercion or lacks popular support, it may be viewed as illegitimate. Ultimately, legitimacy is a subjective assessment influenced by cultural, political, and historical factors.
Power may be equated to confidence, inspiration or motivation that urges an individual to learn a language. The 'power' can be both an internal desire or external influence that may be physical, intellectual, social or psychological factors to communicate with humans.
Power is usually related to rank such as the Prime Minister would have more power over say a normal citizen in matters such as running the country but authority is not related to rank and authority may be given such as the police force may have authority to search your house as they have been given a search warrant.
In political science, POWER is the ability to control events. AUTHORITY is the source of that power. Some examples: In the US, the Congress has the POWER to enact laws, based on the AUTHORITY of the US Constitution. In a military dictatorship, the ruling military command has the POWER to run the country, but may lack popular or legal AUTHORITY to do so.
In political science, POWER is the ability to control events. AUTHORITY is the source of that power. Some examples: In the US, the Congress has the POWER to enact laws, based on the AUTHORITY of the US Constitution. In a military Dictatorship, the ruling military command has the POWER to run the country, but may lack popular or legal AUTHORITY to do so.
Power stems from a variety of sources: reward power, coercive power, information power, resource power, expert power, referent power, and legitimate power
Authority is derived from the position someone holds within an organization or society, granting them the right to make decisions and enforce rules. However, power manifests in the ability to influence others and drive change, which may not always align with one's official authority. Consequently, a person in a position of authority may lack actual power if they do not have the respect, trust, or influence necessary to enact their decisions. Thus, while authority and power often coexist, they are not synonymous, and not all authority effectively translates into power.
to withdraw their consent and challenge the government's authority. This principle is rooted in the social contract theory, which asserts that legitimate governance arises from the agreement of the governed. If a government fails to represent the will or interests of its citizens, it risks losing its legitimacy and may be subject to resistance or reform by the people. Ultimately, the power of the government is derived from the consent of the governed.
Likely because the credibility of power depends on its actual use. If a ruler does not exercise her power, then there may be uncertainty about her desire to do so in the future.
abuse and love may be often equated, because love can hurt a lot and as for abuse also hurts (obviously)
The influence technique described is known as "legitimate power." This occurs when leaders assert their authority to justify a resource requisition, even in situations where their authority may not be immediately evident. By leveraging their position or role, they aim to persuade others to comply with their requests based on their perceived legitimacy rather than explicit necessity. This technique often relies on the established hierarchy within an organization to reinforce compliance.