Hannibal lost his siege machines when he crossed the Alps to get into Italy. Without these machines we could not hope to take a city the size of Rome, which would have had to be starved into submission with a long siege. After travelling from northern to central Italy and winning a battle there, Hannibal headed to the south instead attacking Rome for this reason.
in the mountains where it was too cold for most of them to survive to be more specific - in the Alps
The Alps were not and still are not in Rome. The Alps are the northern border of Italy, whereas Rome is in central Italy. The Alps were in the Roman Empire, not in Rome. High mountain ranges make travelling more difficult and slower. That was the disadvantage. The Alps also had the advantage of making invasions into Italy more difficult. However, this advantage was relative as towards the end of the empire, the Alemanni crossed the Alps and raided northern Italy several times. It is likely that having to cross the alps slowed down reaching Italy and gave the Roman army more time to organise its counteroffensive.
because when casear died of 44 when the senators murders him but he had to pass it to his nephew Marc Antony and others helped.....
The Carthaginian general who invadedItalyduring the Second Punic War was Hannibal. He fought against Rome and herItalianallies, but did not actually attack Rome itself. He could not because he lost his siege machines while crossing the Alps to getintoItaly He routed the armies of the Romans andtheirallies twice, once in the north and once in centralItaly. He then moved on to the south ofItalyinstead of heading for Rome. He routed theRomansand their allies once more and fought the rest of hiscampaignin the south.
the purpose of a land attack was to gain more land
Striped animals in a crowd are more difficult to single out and therefore more difficult to attack. So they have safety in numbers.
in the mountains where it was too cold for most of them to survive to be more specific - in the Alps
The Alps made invasions of Italy more difficult. The Apennines provided water sources which were used to carry water to Rome with the aqueducts.
If you're at the receiving end of an attack, it's a difficult to consider one less dangerous than the other. However, the wolves are more territorial, and more likely to attack.
Because the airways are restricted, preventing the free flow of air into the lungs.
Make it more difficult to obtain/access anything that can be used against us.
The Alps were not and still are not in Rome. The Alps are the northern border of Italy, whereas Rome is in central Italy. The Alps were in the Roman Empire, not in Rome. High mountain ranges make travelling more difficult and slower. That was the disadvantage. The Alps also had the advantage of making invasions into Italy more difficult. However, this advantage was relative as towards the end of the empire, the Alemanni crossed the Alps and raided northern Italy several times. It is likely that having to cross the alps slowed down reaching Italy and gave the Roman army more time to organise its counteroffensive.
because the international circumstances of the political government are coming to an end
because when casear died of 44 when the senators murders him but he had to pass it to his nephew Marc Antony and others helped.....
The Carthaginian general who invadedItalyduring the Second Punic War was Hannibal. He fought against Rome and herItalianallies, but did not actually attack Rome itself. He could not because he lost his siege machines while crossing the Alps to getintoItaly He routed the armies of the Romans andtheirallies twice, once in the north and once in centralItaly. He then moved on to the south ofItalyinstead of heading for Rome. He routed theRomansand their allies once more and fought the rest of hiscampaignin the south.
The greatest mistake perhaps was when he chose not to besiege Rome but go around and try recruit more soldiers during his time in Italy. Rome took that opportunity to send soldiers to Carthage and Hispania (what is now North Africa and Spain) and thereby forcing Hannibal to return to Carthage and fight the battle of Zama which he lost. If he had beseiged Rome, he might have won and even if he didn't, it would still somehow influence the course of history for beseiging Rome would've kept second Punic War to last longer (for example, beseiging Rome might prevent messengers, orders or soldiers from Rome to leave for other places like Carthage and Hispania and thereby preventing the Battle of Zama to even happen perhaps).
Ancient Rome was more sucessful.