Nicholas II was a poor leader for quite a lot of reasons. He did not go on tours, so the information about what was going on in Russia was given to him from a small number of people who were happy to lie to him. He employed friends and family in top positions to courts, he made a huge fortune from bribes and he believed elections would lead to the downfall of Russia.
Source Various History Textbooks for a GCSE Essay. Hoped This Helped
he was selfish and loved being ruler
Yes, Phillip the II was Alexander the greats fatherPhillip the II was the ruler of Macedonia and was killed by an assassin so Alexander then became the ruler of Macedonia
No, He was not.
Grand Duchess Anastasia Nikolaevna Romanova
Henry II.
The Russian People thought that their leader, Tsar Nicholas II was all together not worthy of being the Autocratic Ruler of their motherland. They thought him incompetent, idiotic and insignificant.
he was a good ruler
yes, majority of the aztecs where happy with him.
he was selfish and loved being ruler
he is known for being czar in Russia the ruler
Nicolas II became Czar after the death of his father in 1894.
Nicolas Soames has written: 'Famous People in History, Volume II'
Nicolas II
yes
Nicholas II (1868-1918). He was the last emperor of Russia.
ramesidioticsees II
The ruler of Liverpool is the same ruler as for the rest of England, Queen Elizabeth II.