The lower social class of the Byzantine Empire was often referred to as the "peasants" or "lower classes," which included farmers, laborers, and artisans. They typically worked the land or in trades and had limited rights and wealth compared to the upper classes, such as the aristocracy and the clergy. Many peasants were subject to heavy taxation and feudal obligations, which further constrained their social mobility. Despite their challenges, they formed the backbone of the Byzantine economy and society.
The unifying force in the Byzantine empire was the church . In the church the priests were the hiqhest class & this was also true in their society. The peasants were their worshippers. The church was a way to get the lower class to follow the government by connecting it to the leader . Social classes in church apply to the government .
Theodora and Justinian significantly strengthened the Byzantine Empire through their ambitious reforms and policies. Justinian implemented a comprehensive legal code known as the Corpus Juris Civilis, which streamlined and codified Roman law, influencing legal systems for centuries. Theodora, known for her intelligence and political acumen, championed women's rights and social welfare reforms, helping to improve the status of women and the lower classes. Together, they also worked to expand the empire's territories and consolidate its power, leaving a lasting legacy on Byzantine governance and culture.
The Islamic Empire was a competing empire at the time. They both flourished in art. They also had very strong yet different religious beliefs;the Byzantines were Christians and the Islamic s were Muslim. There was not an Islamic Empire. The Arab force which attacked the Byzantine Empire was the Umayyad Caliphate. It took over Egypt and the Levant (Palestine, Lebanon and Syria) but not Turkey. The Sassanid (Persian) Empire, the Bulgarian Empire (which took over the lower Danube area) and the Rus of Kiev were major competitors before this. In the Byzantine-Sassanid war he two empires exhausted each other and this made way for the Umayyads advance which took over Persia as well. After the Umayyads, the challengers were the Seljuk Turks who took over eastern Turkey, and the Crusaders. The latter formed the Latin Empire which took over much of Greece and the northwest strip of the Turkish coast, and set up the vassal states of the Duchy of Athens and the Principality of Achaea (the Peloponnese peninsula) . This split the Byzantine Empire into the Empire of Nicaea (western Turkey)and the Despotate of Epirus (western Greece). Serbia and Hungary took over the rest of the Balkans. The Byzantines eventually managed to expel the crusaders. Finally, the nail in the coffin was put by the Ottoman Turks which took over the Byzantine Empire
The lower class in Byzantine society, known as the "proletarians," consisted of peasants and urban laborers. They had limited economic opportunities and often struggled to make a living. Their social status and living conditions were generally poor, and they had limited access to education and political power.
Its actually a slightly tricky question. I think that the best answer is that the Byzantine Empire is essentially the successor state to the Roman Empire. Emperor Constantine, feeling the Empire was too large to govern, split the empire into East and West. After the Roman Empire fell, the remnant, the Eastern Empire came to be known as the Byzantine Empire. The Byzantine emperors called themselves Emperors of the Romans. **Actually the answer above is a bit off the mark. Constantine was the Emperor who reunited the Empire. Diocletian was the one who split it into western and eastern sections. Diocletian was also the one who set up a Tetrarchy (meaning there were four rulers). Each part of the Empire had an Augustus, or senior Emperor, and a Caesar, or junior Emperor. Diocletian rules in the east, Maximian took the west and ruled from Mediolanum (now known as Milan). Galerius was placed as Caesar in the Balkans, and Constantius Chlorus (Constantine's father) was given the area Gaul and Britain to rule. Different historians place the "beginning" of the Byzantine Empire at different dates according to which event they consider more important. There are 3 candidates for the beginning of the Empire: 1. 285 AD, when Diocletian split the Empire. 2. 324 AD, when Constantine started building the new capital. 3. 330 AD, when this new capital (Constantinople) was dedicated. One of the best books on The Byzantine Empire is a 3-volume set written by John Julius Norwich: Volume I - Byzantium: The Early Years Volume II - Byzantium: The Apogee Volume III - Byzantium: The Decline and Fall There are many others, but this series should be an excellent introduction.
The unifying force in the Byzantine empire was the church . In the church the priests were the hiqhest class & this was also true in their society. The peasants were their worshippers. The church was a way to get the lower class to follow the government by connecting it to the leader . Social classes in church apply to the government .
Theodora and Justinian significantly strengthened the Byzantine Empire through their ambitious reforms and policies. Justinian implemented a comprehensive legal code known as the Corpus Juris Civilis, which streamlined and codified Roman law, influencing legal systems for centuries. Theodora, known for her intelligence and political acumen, championed women's rights and social welfare reforms, helping to improve the status of women and the lower classes. Together, they also worked to expand the empire's territories and consolidate its power, leaving a lasting legacy on Byzantine governance and culture.
Upper,middle, then lower class
The Islamic Empire was a competing empire at the time. They both flourished in art. They also had very strong yet different religious beliefs;the Byzantines were Christians and the Islamic s were Muslim. There was not an Islamic Empire. The Arab force which attacked the Byzantine Empire was the Umayyad Caliphate. It took over Egypt and the Levant (Palestine, Lebanon and Syria) but not Turkey. The Sassanid (Persian) Empire, the Bulgarian Empire (which took over the lower Danube area) and the Rus of Kiev were major competitors before this. In the Byzantine-Sassanid war he two empires exhausted each other and this made way for the Umayyads advance which took over Persia as well. After the Umayyads, the challengers were the Seljuk Turks who took over eastern Turkey, and the Crusaders. The latter formed the Latin Empire which took over much of Greece and the northwest strip of the Turkish coast, and set up the vassal states of the Duchy of Athens and the Principality of Achaea (the Peloponnese peninsula) . This split the Byzantine Empire into the Empire of Nicaea (western Turkey)and the Despotate of Epirus (western Greece). Serbia and Hungary took over the rest of the Balkans. The Byzantines eventually managed to expel the crusaders. Finally, the nail in the coffin was put by the Ottoman Turks which took over the Byzantine Empire
The lower class in Byzantine society, known as the "proletarians," consisted of peasants and urban laborers. They had limited economic opportunities and often struggled to make a living. Their social status and living conditions were generally poor, and they had limited access to education and political power.
if the higher social standing people didnt surpress the lower class they wouldn't of had the back bone they needed to make it an empire. the lower class woul dbe free to do as the pleased. and that wouldn't be in the best intrest of the empire of those who didnt have to work to survive
I believe the Social Structures of the Empire of Mali were.. * Kings, at the Top * Priests * Storytellers, or Griots * Slaves. Hopefully, that will be able to help you.
Its actually a slightly tricky question. I think that the best answer is that the Byzantine Empire is essentially the successor state to the Roman Empire. Emperor Constantine, feeling the Empire was too large to govern, split the empire into East and West. After the Roman Empire fell, the remnant, the Eastern Empire came to be known as the Byzantine Empire. The Byzantine emperors called themselves Emperors of the Romans. **Actually the answer above is a bit off the mark. Constantine was the Emperor who reunited the Empire. Diocletian was the one who split it into western and eastern sections. Diocletian was also the one who set up a Tetrarchy (meaning there were four rulers). Each part of the Empire had an Augustus, or senior Emperor, and a Caesar, or junior Emperor. Diocletian rules in the east, Maximian took the west and ruled from Mediolanum (now known as Milan). Galerius was placed as Caesar in the Balkans, and Constantius Chlorus (Constantine's father) was given the area Gaul and Britain to rule. Different historians place the "beginning" of the Byzantine Empire at different dates according to which event they consider more important. There are 3 candidates for the beginning of the Empire: 1. 285 AD, when Diocletian split the Empire. 2. 324 AD, when Constantine started building the new capital. 3. 330 AD, when this new capital (Constantinople) was dedicated. One of the best books on The Byzantine Empire is a 3-volume set written by John Julius Norwich: Volume I - Byzantium: The Early Years Volume II - Byzantium: The Apogee Volume III - Byzantium: The Decline and Fall There are many others, but this series should be an excellent introduction.
Mr Beattie said not to get your answers from Answer.Com Love An Atech Student :)
Yes, it certainly was an empire. A king called Phillip of Macedon united with lower Greece and conquered neighboring territories and then his son Alexander the Great went all out and conquered Persia and added much of the eastern world to the empire. It was short lived and fell apart after the death of Alexander, but while it lasted it was an empire.
In New Rome, or the Byzantine Empire, education was highly valued and closely linked to both religious and civic life. It emphasized the importance of classical literature, philosophy, and rhetoric, often influenced by Greek and Roman traditions. Education was primarily reserved for the elite, though some opportunities existed for the lower classes, and it played a crucial role in shaping the bureaucratic and cultural elite of the empire. Overall, education was seen as essential for maintaining social order and fostering informed citizens.
Commoners in ancient rome were called plebians.