During World War II, the treatment of Indians by the Japanese varied significantly depending on the context and location. In areas like Southeast Asia, where many Indians were under British colonial rule, some were treated as potential allies and recruited into the Indian National Army (INA) led by Subhas Chandra Bose. However, the experiences of Indians also included harsh conditions, forced labor, and violence, particularly in occupied territories. Overall, the Japanese approach was complex and often opportunistic, aimed at undermining British colonial rule while managing local populations.
The Indians in the Northwest territory were supposed to be treated equally and fairly.
they were treated poorly
Australian POWs were treated as appallingly as other whites in Japanese camps. They were used as slave labour.
some Indian's were treated like slave's. some were treated with respect and others might be treated right in the middle
Columbus treated the Indians poorly. Columbus killed and tortured many native Indians.
the chinese were treated worse than others. The malays and indians were treated slightly better as the Japanese wanted to earn the trust from them. The eurasians were also tortured as they helped to fight against the japanese.
Japanese residents were interned. Japanese POW were treated in accord with the Geneva Convention.
The indians were treated horribly, they were beaten by missionaries if they didn't do things right.
The indians were treated horribly, they were beaten by missionaries if they didn't do things right.
They generally had positive relations with Indians. They were opposed to slavery. They treated Indians with respect.
The Indians in the Northwest territory were supposed to be treated equally and fairly.
The Indians at Fort Sill were treated like all Indians on resrvations - badly - but not as badly as Pine Ridge
they were treated poorly
they were not treated well
They were now treated as individuals
Poorly
the Indians treated their children by giving them medican?