The slaves would be whipped, put in irons or have their ear or finger cut off if they ran away. If they rebbeled they would be tied and burned.
African slaves were dehumanized and were forced to disassociate themselves from any memory of their culture and family. The owners forced their wills upon the slaves by using overseers, who were often their offspring from female slaves. The slaves were encouraged to separate by skin color and position assigned by the masters on the plantations. The slave was treated as chatel and property and less than the owers favorite pet, causing feeings of inferiority and hate for one another.
not all slaves were treated the same because some were lucky enough to get nice masters. for an example phyllis wheatley had a very nice master who decided to educate her and she became a famous poet. that's not true. the females were raped by their masters to continue their family lines.
slavery was hard and cruel like it was in America, but it was not based on race it was based on wealth. and the people who couldn't pay for housing or food became slaves. it was meant to be that the slaves were to be treated fairly and got the same food as their masters but eventually the masters got greedy and treated them harshly and sold/bought them like animals.
The slaves were not treated good at all I guess you can try to imagine jail now and then multiply it by 100 and then you will see how the slaves were treated.
All slaves served their masters for their masters' or their life. Different cultural angles such as America ,gave the owner freedom to release slaves whenever wanted.
No, they lived with their masters as well.
because they are treated badly
The Norman slaves were treated in an ill manner and not regarded as humans, They were subjected to heavy work and constant whipping by their masters.
They were treated badly but generally better than most other slave communities in the New World.
Basically to get what the masters wanted them to do. strict punishment for not doing what you are told, and setting an example for all the other slaves
not all slaves were treated the same because some were lucky enough to get nice masters. for an example phyllis wheatley had a very nice master who decided to educate her and she became a famous poet. that's not true. the females were raped by their masters to continue their family lines.
There are many statements about the treatment of slaves that are not correct. For instance it would not be true to say that slaves got preferential treatment from their masters.
slavery was hard and cruel like it was in America, but it was not based on race it was based on wealth. and the people who couldn't pay for housing or food became slaves. it was meant to be that the slaves were to be treated fairly and got the same food as their masters but eventually the masters got greedy and treated them harshly and sold/bought them like animals.
Yes, some disobedient slaves were killed by excessive whipping. This, however, was not the case for all slaves and masters. While there were surely some mean owners, most of them treated their slaves fairly. This is because they knew how important the slaves were to their economy.
In Colonial America and the United States, slaves were fed as their masters saw fit. Some masters treated their slaves like one would treat any expensive property (for they were quite expensive for the times): with great care. They fed them well and treated them well so that they would not lose their investment. Other masters treated the slaves like they were nothing -- they gave them little, perhaps spoiled, food. [On a side note, Colonial America and the United States are not the only time and place slaves were held. Slaves have been held since the beginning of time -- by Ancient Romans, Ancient Greeks, Ancient Egyptians, African Tribes, the list goes on. I assumed your question was referring to the Americas because they are the most talked about.]
I have not read the book, but I understand it was written by a Connecticut women. It is about how slaves were treated badly by their masters in pre-civil war south.
no they arent kind to slaves
Because, they were property to their slave masters, and the slave masters could do anything that they wanted to the slaves in order for the slaves to keep their lives.