It improved Medieval European society.
encomienda system
because they were scared of african americans.
It was just replaced by the Hacienda system.
it is a system in which the spanish crown implemented
Chattel slavery
patroon system in new Netherlands. :)
The encomienda system is most comparable to a feudal economic system. In both systems, a ruling class is granted control over land and labor, often exploiting the labor of a subordinate class for agricultural production and resource extraction. Similar to feudalism, the encomienda system involved a hierarchical structure where the encomenderos (landlords) received labor and tribute from indigenous peoples in exchange for protection and governance. Both systems highlight inequities in power and wealth distribution, relying on coercive labor practices.
the answer is encomienda. :D
It improved Medieval European society.
Both groups were forced to labor under brutal and inhumane conditions for the benefit of European masters.
Both groups were forced to labor under brutal and inhumane conditions for the benefit of European masters.
The encomienda was a dependency relation system.
encomienda system
because they were scared of african americans.
Japanese feudalism and European feudalism both featured a hierarchical structure based on land ownership and loyalty. In Japan, land was controlled by powerful lords known as daimyo, who granted land to samurai in exchange for military service, similar to the European system where lords provided land (fiefs) to vassals for their allegiance. Both systems emphasized a code of honor—bushido in Japan and chivalry in Europe—governing the conduct of warriors. Ultimately, both feudal systems created a decentralized political structure reliant on local power dynamics.
The Encomienda system required Spanish colonists to care for the native people.