It is not clear whether you are referring to the senators of the modern Italian senate or to the senators of ancient Rome. In the former case both the senators and the MPs are elected. In the latter case the senate was not an elected body and was not a legislative body. It was an advisory body of the rulers. It was composed of patricians (aristocrats) and former executive officers of state.
The senators of rome stab him to death
Because the the senators of Rome believed he wanted to become a king. If he did the, senators would not have any power.
The senators were not officials. The were member of the senate and did not have an executive role. The plebeian were not officials either. They were the representatives of the plebeians and did not have executive functions. The censors were officials. The senators, the plebeian tribunes and Roman officials did keep their original role. Their roles never changed. The question was that some divisive issues in Rome were intractable.
The senators in ancient Rome had the privilege of wearing a broad purple stripe on their tunics and togas, which told the world who they were. They were also given special seating at all public events.The senators in ancient Rome had the privilege of wearing a broad purple stripe on their tunics and togas, which told the world who they were. They were also given special seating at all public events.The senators in ancient Rome had the privilege of wearing a broad purple stripe on their tunics and togas, which told the world who they were. They were also given special seating at all public events.The senators in ancient Rome had the privilege of wearing a broad purple stripe on their tunics and togas, which told the world who they were. They were also given special seating at all public events.The senators in ancient Rome had the privilege of wearing a broad purple stripe on their tunics and togas, which told the world who they were. They were also given special seating at all public events.The senators in ancient Rome had the privilege of wearing a broad purple stripe on their tunics and togas, which told the world who they were. They were also given special seating at all public events.The senators in ancient Rome had the privilege of wearing a broad purple stripe on their tunics and togas, which told the world who they were. They were also given special seating at all public events.The senators in ancient Rome had the privilege of wearing a broad purple stripe on their tunics and togas, which told the world who they were. They were also given special seating at all public events.The senators in ancient Rome had the privilege of wearing a broad purple stripe on their tunics and togas, which told the world who they were. They were also given special seating at all public events.
No, it was not.
The Senators of Rome appointed officials to land super mission working. There were about 300 senators!
Some citizens of Rome wanted to kill Caesar and they succeeded. His assassins were all senators. However most of the other senators and the common people of Rome were pro-Caesar and were more than willing to let him rule for as long as he wanted.Some citizens of Rome wanted to kill Caesar and they succeeded. His assassins were all senators. However most of the other senators and the common people of Rome were pro-Caesar and were more than willing to let him rule for as long as he wanted.Some citizens of Rome wanted to kill Caesar and they succeeded. His assassins were all senators. However most of the other senators and the common people of Rome were pro-Caesar and were more than willing to let him rule for as long as he wanted.Some citizens of Rome wanted to kill Caesar and they succeeded. His assassins were all senators. However most of the other senators and the common people of Rome were pro-Caesar and were more than willing to let him rule for as long as he wanted.Some citizens of Rome wanted to kill Caesar and they succeeded. His assassins were all senators. However most of the other senators and the common people of Rome were pro-Caesar and were more than willing to let him rule for as long as he wanted.Some citizens of Rome wanted to kill Caesar and they succeeded. His assassins were all senators. However most of the other senators and the common people of Rome were pro-Caesar and were more than willing to let him rule for as long as he wanted.Some citizens of Rome wanted to kill Caesar and they succeeded. His assassins were all senators. However most of the other senators and the common people of Rome were pro-Caesar and were more than willing to let him rule for as long as he wanted.Some citizens of Rome wanted to kill Caesar and they succeeded. His assassins were all senators. However most of the other senators and the common people of Rome were pro-Caesar and were more than willing to let him rule for as long as he wanted.Some citizens of Rome wanted to kill Caesar and they succeeded. His assassins were all senators. However most of the other senators and the common people of Rome were pro-Caesar and were more than willing to let him rule for as long as he wanted.
The Senators of Rome appointed officials to land super mission working. There were about 300 senators!
Their entire life
The senators went politically weak when they tried to regain power of Rome. They lost most of its political power and prestige.
of Rome, as in senators of Rome, would be Romae. But "Roman," such as Roman citizen, would be Romanus/Romana.
The senators of rome stab him to death
Because the the senators of Rome believed he wanted to become a king. If he did the, senators would not have any power.
Emporer Senators Equestrians Plebians Freedmen Slaves
Emperors, slaves, consuls, senators this is ancient Rome
Plebeians were the common folk of ancient Rome and had no Senators. In the US Congress, there are Senators and Representatives. The term plebeian has no formal application in that structure.
The senators were not officials. The were member of the senate and did not have an executive role. The plebeian were not officials either. They were the representatives of the plebeians and did not have executive functions. The censors were officials. The senators, the plebeian tribunes and Roman officials did keep their original role. Their roles never changed. The question was that some divisive issues in Rome were intractable.