Not as widespread as most people would have you believe. Only 6% of southerners owned slaves and of those, even fewer owned more than one. Most of the slaves were owned by large plantation owners. Slaves cost about what a luxury car would cost in today's terms and there was no guarantee that it would work, so unless someone had an enormous amount of money and a lot of work for them, they weren't very cost effective.
They did not want slavery in the south they wanted to be apart of slavery.
Yes. The South was pro-slavery, while the North was anti-slavery. Hope this helps!
the north fought the south, and the north won north- against slavery south- slavery
No. North wanted to end slavery and south wanted slavery
The South looked at slavery as an economic issue. The North viewed slavery as a moral issue. In the North, slavery was proving to be unprofitable in the North and was dying out by the end of the American Revolution, but in the South white Southerners were increasingly more defensive of slavery.
because the south had an extreme amout of land for plantation.
It resulted in the widespread use of slavery in the South
agricultural society
Very important and widespread
The KKK was the mostly in the southern states because that was where slavery was and because was popular in the south
The south was against slavery.
slavery
Actually the NORTH was against slavery, and the SOUTH wanted slavery.
yes slavery was good for the south
The South favoured slavery
Racial slavery is the process of enslaving a group of people based on the race that they belong to. One of the most familiar and widespread forms of racial slavery was the slavery of blacks in the U.S.
They did not want slavery in the south they wanted to be apart of slavery.