You just say whatever fits the case>
He had offended a French nobleman- and was imprisoned in the Bastille without trial or opportunity to defend himself. Fearing an indefinite length of term, he suggested exile to England and the French authorities accepted.
bad
A preliminary hearing might better balance the rights of society and the rights of the accused. With a preliminary hearing a judge is going to weigh the evidence and decide if there is enough evidence for trial. With a grand jury, a group of citizens decides if there is enough evidence for trial.
yes it was because his life was in jeopardy
because Hitler shot himself or was shot it is desputable before he could be captured and himmler was captured by the british but killed himself when he swallowed cyenide in prison before he could go on trial.
You defend a trial argument bygetting a laywergetting a entorneyor not arguing at all
At her trial she blamed everything she and Dr Browning did on Riley, as Riley was dead and could not defend himself.
After an indictment is issued, the case moves forward to trial where evidence is presented, witnesses testify, and the accused has the opportunity to defend themselves. The ultimate outcome of the trial could result in a conviction or an acquittal.
Yes, a lawyer can effectively defend a guilty client in a court of law by ensuring the client's rights are protected, challenging the prosecution's evidence, and advocating for a fair trial.
The admissions in paragraphs four and five of Randall Dee's Answer will likely weaken his defense in the trial. These admissions may be used as evidence against him, and may undermine his credibility and the strength of his argument. They could potentially support the plaintiff's case and make it more difficult for Randall Dee to defend himself successfully.
When Charles I refused to defend himself at his trial in 1649, he asserted that the court had no legitimate authority to try him. His silence and refusal to engage in the proceedings were seen as a defiance of the charges against him, which included treason. Ultimately, this stance did not prevent his conviction, and he was sentenced to death, leading to his execution on January 30, 1649. His refusal to participate was interpreted as a statement of his belief in the divine right of kings and his view of the trial as illegitimate.
To defend the defendent
No, a case cannot proceed to trial without any evidence. Evidence is necessary to support the claims made by both the prosecution and defense in a trial. Without evidence, there is no basis for a trial to proceed.
Defense counsel must be provided with evidence. If you are a spectator you must attend the trial and see for yourself what evidence is produced at trial.Defense counsel must be provided with evidence. If you are a spectator you must attend the trial and see for yourself what evidence is produced at trial.Defense counsel must be provided with evidence. If you are a spectator you must attend the trial and see for yourself what evidence is produced at trial.Defense counsel must be provided with evidence. If you are a spectator you must attend the trial and see for yourself what evidence is produced at trial.
A body of evidence would include all of the evidence of a particular trial. It may be physical evidence or it may be circumstantial evidence or a combination of both.
The cast of Tak zhit nelzya - 1990 includes: Francis Biddle as Himself - US Judge at Nuremberg Olya Dvoretskaya as Herself - Senior Police Lieutenant Wilhelm Frick as Himself - Nuremberg Trial Hans Fritzsche as Himself - Nuremberg Trial Walther Funk as Himself - Nuremberg Trial Stanislav Govorukhin as Commentator Rudolf Hess as Himself - Nuremberg Trial Alfred Jodl as Himself - Nuremberg Trial Ernst Kaltenbrunner as Himself - Nuremberg Trial Wilhelm Keitel as Himself - Nuremberg Trial Geoffrey Lawrence as Himself - British Judge at Nuremberg Aleksandr Nevzorov as Himself - Journalist Erich Raeder as Himself - Nuremberg Trial Alfred Rosenberg as Himself - Nuremberg Trial Roman Rudenko as Himself - Soviet Prosecutor at Nuremberg Fritz Sauckel as Himself - Nuremberg Trial Hjalmar Schacht as Himself - Nuremberg Trial Maximilian Schell as German Commentator Albert Speer as Himself - Nuremberg Trial Julius Streicher as Himself - Nuremberg Trial Konstantin von Neurath as Himself - Nuremberg Trial Franz von Papen as Himself - Nuremberg Trial Joachim von Ribbentrop as Himself - Nuremberg Trial Baldur von Schirach as Himself - Nuremberg Trial
The court believed Gideon could not defend himself due to his lack of formal legal training and the complex nature of the law. Additionally, the court recognized that the right to a fair trial includes the provision of legal counsel for defendants who cannot afford an attorney, as this is essential for ensuring justice and a fair defense. Gideon's inability to adequately represent himself could lead to an unfair trial, thereby undermining the integrity of the judicial process.