To accurately describe the action of Historian B, I would need more context regarding their specific actions or contributions. Generally, historians analyze, interpret, and contextualize historical events, often utilizing primary and secondary sources to construct narratives. If Historian B undertook a particular study or published a work, their action could be characterized as contributing to the understanding of a specific historical period or theme. Please provide more details for a tailored response.
B. Stories
l don't know
Historian B may mention the Boston Massacre to highlight its significance in galvanizing colonial opposition to British rule and to illustrate the escalating tensions between colonists and British authorities. In contrast, Historian A might choose to focus on different events or themes that align more closely with their narrative or argument, deemphasizing the Boston Massacre's role in the broader context of American Revolution. Each historian's selection of events reflects their specific analytical lens and the aspects of history they wish to emphasize.
a) Centrifugal force is not even a real force, it is a fictitious force. b) Action and reaction forces act on DIFFERENT objects. If A acts on B, then B acts on A.
they suck my dodo for life b%%%
B. Stories
George B. Cooper - historian - was born on 1916-04-14.
George B. Cooper - historian - died on 1995-10-18.
Causation in fact means that if Action A had not occurred, then the Action B would not have occurred. That means Action A is a cause in fact of Action B. In contrast, proximate cause means simply that Action A is related to Action B.
B and C only..........plato users only
Historian A wants to make the colonists appear in negative light by suggesting that they did not really believe in freedom for all
boring
The opportunity cost of doing action A is not doing action B. So, the opportunity cost theoretically depends upon how much you value action A over action B (ie, value of action A - value of action B).
l don't know
B. A historian reads a letter written by a soldier in the Vietnam War and makes a generalization about the experiences of other soldiers in that war.
It would be worth somewhere between $35 -$55
Historian B may mention the Boston Massacre to highlight its significance in galvanizing colonial opposition to British rule and to illustrate the escalating tensions between colonists and British authorities. In contrast, Historian A might choose to focus on different events or themes that align more closely with their narrative or argument, deemphasizing the Boston Massacre's role in the broader context of American Revolution. Each historian's selection of events reflects their specific analytical lens and the aspects of history they wish to emphasize.