answersLogoWhite

0

The king and Queen of Spain sent Columbus to America. The Spanish Government controlled The Spanish Colonies until they overthrew Spanish rule. The colonies existed for the benefit of Spain. Very little benefit accrued to the conquered. The French mainly existed to provide furs for France. In Haiti, a plantation owner wanted to make his money and return to France as fast as possible. He had no desire to remain there and develop the land. The French in Canada preferred the English Rulers during the American Revolution and fought against an American Army sent to Canada. They refused an offer from a French Army to become a part of France again. The Dutch ruled New York for a brief period of time.

Private enterprise or corporations and not the government sent the British colonies to America. Both the investors in England and the colonists had a financial interest in the success of the colony. They worked to make it a success. They also had English Law working for them. When an English Army conquered New York, the Dutch settlers preferred living under English Law to Dutch Law. They fought against a Dutch Army sent to reconquer them.

The English Colonies also had either partial or full self government. The others did not. This helped keep foreign tyranny at bay.

Of course trouble came in 1763 when King George III decided to change things.

French and Spanish colonies pretty much only existed for the 'home lands'. The colonies provided furs and other raw product.

On the other hand the English colonies had a tad bit more freedom. Although they still were 'guinea pigs' for the home land...

~Lexy Lynch

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

How did the French system of colonial rule differ from that of great Britain?

France exercised more direct control over its African colonies.


How did the French system of colonial rule from that of Great Britain?

There were several differences, but the clearest is that French colonial rule was direct from the Paris while British colonial rule preferred to leave amenable local leaders in charge.


How did the french system of colonial differ from that of great Britain?

There were several differences, but the clearest is that French colonial rule was direct from the Paris while British colonial rule preferred to leave amenable local leaders in charge.


What president fought both for and against the british?

George Washington was in the British army during the French and Indian War. That gave him the experience he needed to command the Colonial army against the British,


During the Great War for Empire?

deep-seated differences in military discipline emerged between the British officers and the American colonial troops


Why did the french and british have problems in the colonial period?

they had a lot of problems because of the differences they had. for example, their religion was different, they liked diffenrent styles and so on.


What are the differences between how the British and the Patriots fought in battles?

The British were formal, had fancy weapons, lots of Experience, and wore uniforms. The Patriots ( us ) wore rags, and had less experience, but had better strategies. The british fought in lines and with bayonets, the Patriots didn't


Do you capitalize British colonial policy?

Yes. It should be --- British Colonial Policy.


Was the battle of Saratoga a British or Colonial victory?

Colonial, British general John Burgoyne surrendered


When was British Colonial Hilton Nassau created?

British Colonial Hilton Nassau was created in 1901.


Was George Washington on the British or the Colonial side?

Colonial


What happened right after the Battle of Concord?

Colonial militia chased the British to Boston.