He is mostly reliable as a source of information but this should be checked against other sources. He is prone to exaggeration (eg his description of the Persian army which invaded Greece gives the total levy of the Persian Empire at over two million soldiers, whereas probably only a tenth of that was selected to form the invasion force - so the gross numbers were correct, but he doesn't define those who actually went. Similarly his Persian fleet of 1200 was correct, but only the best 600 actually were used).
The real problem is that the other historians who covered the period were much more unreliable than he was.
Historians will examine a second hand source of a historical event. If the second hand source matches up to other sources of information, then each source in a certain manner adds to the credibility of the historical event.
The two founders of Greek historical writing were Herodotus and Thucydides. While they had different styles, they attempted to be truthful and forthright.
Herodotus's full name is simply Herodotus. Herodotus was born in 425 BC and is known as the Father of History.
Yes, before Herodotus, the Greeks had various ways of explaining the past. Mythology played a significant role, with tales of gods, heroes, and legendary events serving as explanations for historical phenomena. Poets like Homer also contributed through epic narratives that blended history and myth, providing a cultural framework for understanding earlier times. However, Herodotus is often regarded as the first to systematically document historical events and offer a more critical approach to sources and evidence.
fottiti
he was a reliable resource because he was at the battle of Thermopylae so he is a primerey source
Herodotus is considered to be the father of history. Herodotus was the first to record a historical event and that was the Persian War.
The adjectival form of Herodotus is "Herodotean." This term is often used to describe things related to Herodotus, particularly his works or the style of historical writing associated with him. Herodotus is known as the "Father of History," so "Herodotean" can also refer to the methods and themes found in his historical narratives.
Historians will examine a second hand source of a historical event. If the second hand source matches up to other sources of information, then each source in a certain manner adds to the credibility of the historical event.
The two founders of Greek historical writing were Herodotus and Thucydides. While they had different styles, they attempted to be truthful and forthright.
Biography.com can be considered a reliable source for information about historical figures and well-known individuals. However, it's always a good idea to verify information from multiple sources to ensure accuracy and objectivity.
No, it's based on a real person, but the film is Hollywood at its historical worst. I enjoyed the film as entertainment, but from an historical point of view it utter twaddle.
The complete name of Herodotus is Herodotus of Halicarnassus. He is often referred to as the "Father of History" due to his work "Histories," which is one of the earliest examples of historical writing. Herodotus was born in the 5th century BCE in Halicarnassus, a city in ancient Caria, which is now part of modern-day Turkey.
Reliable is an adjective, and source is a noun.
Yes, Herodotus refers to Stonehedge in his works. It can be read up on in the book from Stonehenge to Samarkand where he discusses his discoveries while venturing to these exotic historical architecture.
Reliable Source Music was created in 1997.
its a source