It is a matter of opinion. Some say he died, some say he went to the isle of Avalon to wait for the time he was needed to return
No. There are no records of a King Arthur in England, certainly not in Anglo-Saxon England.
King Arthur
Arthur is a LEGEND. He was not born, he is a story that grew. If there was a real Arthur, he lived some time between 400 and 800AD.
Guinevere.
Welsh King Arthur and Geoffrey of Monmouth's King Arthur share several similarities, primarily in their roles as heroic figures and leaders. Both versions depict Arthur as a noble king who unites his people against external threats, often embodying ideals of bravery and chivalry. Additionally, both narratives incorporate elements of magic and the supernatural, such as Arthur's connection to Merlin and the mystical sword Excalibur. Ultimately, these portrayals contribute to the enduring legacy of Arthur as a symbol of national identity and mythic heroism in British culture.
No he's dead
He doesn't he was made king because his brother Arthur was dead.
I think it is Avalon (meaning 'Apple')
The genrally accepted name of the land was Avalon.
King Arthur is a legendary king and did not exist.
King Arthur was king of Britain
king arthur was nice and overprotective
King Arthur is a legendary British figure from medieval times and is said to have lived in the late 5th and early 6th centuries. The exact location of King Arthur's burial place or what ultimately happened to him remains a topic of speculation and debate among historians and scholars.
king arthur
No. There are no records of a King Arthur in England, certainly not in Anglo-Saxon England.
Unfortunately, there may not even be enough evidence to prove that he actually existed. And, if he really did exist, he would be long dead by now.
king Arthur's not real