The answer is yes his decedent wrote the book about him. Omg This next bloody son of a gun is right though i will come out and say it. But the next guy erased the perfectly good answers that were here just because he thought we were wrong. He broke one of the constitutional rights in doing that. The First Amendment protects our freedom of speech. So when he deleted them he broke that. So to you are one big idiot. Excuse my rudeness but as my teachers told me know your rights so you can protect them. -MrAnswers123 It is believed that William Wallace, the Scottish patriot, had no children, but he had opportunity to have children out of wedlock and such would not be known to history. There have been many other people named Willaim Wallace, and some of them have certainly had children.
no he didnt
No he didnt
i think she didnt have any children
because he didnt have a boat
they really didnt like it and some didnt wear it on their arm
he didnt invent anything although he created the schiltrom tactic
It Didnt Really Afect The Children
William the Conqueror and his successors did not
no he didnt
No she didnt she didnt even got married
some lied about there age and fought in war and also children didnt really fight in war or do any thing some children thought it was going to be fun thats why they joined
No she didnt get married so she didnt have children keep in mindI dont know but she did have 3 children
no really as he didnt win so william must have been more lucky thanhm but it all goes down in history do you get it history
no he didnt have any children
no he didnt
it didnt
He didnt have parents..