No, but it can be wrongfully applied.
No, the Holocaust was extermination (mass murder). The victims had not been charged with anything or been tried for anything.
They had to set blockades,quater soliders, and no more town meetings. It Was Punishment For Things Done Wrong.
Mass punishment in the Army goes without saying much about, it is seen in many different ways. However there are certain regulations that separate the punishment of all for certain issue but mass punishment in general is somewhat accepted. You will see much of this while in Basic Combat Training (BCT) and Advanced Individual Training (AIT) where in your units it is less likely but can still occur. If you look at it in this respect it might shed some light on the idea of mass punishment, while in BCT everyone must look the same (be in the same uniform), be in formation on time, have all the prescribed materials needed for training, if one soldier shows up late or out of uniform then they that individual has failed the unit, just the same their fellow soldiers allowed them to fail because they did not check behind them. We put certain people in leadership positions to ensure that everyone has what they need and by failing to do such you are just as much to blame.
The punishment for crossing the Rubicon was supposed to be the punishment for treason as it started a civil war. However Caesar won the war so there was no punishment.The punishment for crossing the Rubicon was supposed to be the punishment for treason as it started a civil war. However Caesar won the war so there was no punishment.The punishment for crossing the Rubicon was supposed to be the punishment for treason as it started a civil war. However Caesar won the war so there was no punishment.The punishment for crossing the Rubicon was supposed to be the punishment for treason as it started a civil war. However Caesar won the war so there was no punishment.The punishment for crossing the Rubicon was supposed to be the punishment for treason as it started a civil war. However Caesar won the war so there was no punishment.The punishment for crossing the Rubicon was supposed to be the punishment for treason as it started a civil war. However Caesar won the war so there was no punishment.The punishment for crossing the Rubicon was supposed to be the punishment for treason as it started a civil war. However Caesar won the war so there was no punishment.The punishment for crossing the Rubicon was supposed to be the punishment for treason as it started a civil war. However Caesar won the war so there was no punishment.The punishment for crossing the Rubicon was supposed to be the punishment for treason as it started a civil war. However Caesar won the war so there was no punishment.
The most common punishment was death
saying wrong
No, the Holocaust was about extermination, not punishment. The word punishment suggests that the victims were wrong-doers and were guilty of a crime.
I wish i knew, sorry!:)lol. No, physical punishment of animals is wrong. They do not connect the punishment with the "crime".
Capitol punishment is usually considered wrong because 1. It doesn't punish the criminal. 2. It's just 'murder' in disguise and 3. We were told since birth murder is wrong.
Scolding is verbal punishment. Kind of like wagging your finger and telling someone that what they did is wrong.
its not wrong
because it punishes people for their wrong doings.
Discipline is usually used to correct wrong behavior. Punishment is to stop someone from doing something that they are not supposed to do again.
sickness can be good for punishment from G-d If you do wrong. :-)
I dont know and why kiss a widow? Its wrong..
Punishment can be right for prisoners because they need to rehabilitate and understand what they have done wrong, so the recidivism rates will go down.
The guiding principle is that if you do something wrong you have punishment