answersLogoWhite

0

More in Vietnam, only because it lasted longer.

User Avatar

Wiki User

15y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

The two hot wars of the cold war?

There were many more than just two, but Korea and Vietnam were the largest and most serious of the Cold War 'skirmishes."


How was the UN involved in the Vietnam War?

The UN wasn't really involved in the Vietnam war. It was more involved in the Korean war which happened a few years earlier. American's fear of commmunism seemed to be cemeted when North Korea attacked South Korea, America then asked the UN intervenean to stop the attack. Eventually they organised a military force to stop the attack.


Why didn't the US fight Korea like they fought japan?

Korea had been taken over by the Japanese prior to the war. Thus, one goal of the Allied Pacific war was to liberate Korea from Japanese control. Korea was not an enemy of the Americans; it was more of the damsel in distress.


Why did China accept the vassalage of Korea but not the vassalage of Vietnam?

Because Korea was more closer to Beijing.


What two places did America fight during the cold war?

The United States fought in more than two places during the Cold War, but the two big ones were Korea and Vietnam.


What were the similarities between the Vietnam war and the Korean war?

The ONLY real differences between the two wars was: 1. Geography (Korea was on a peninsula; which made things alot easier). 2. Different decades and languages. 3. Korea was LARGELY fought with left over WWII equipment (weapons, M1 Garand rifle as one example). 4. The Korean War was far more intense than Vietnam (higher casualties in a shorter time period). 5. Korea was cold and full of snow; Vietnam was hot and tropical. 6. Communists were stopped in Korea; they won in Vietnam. 7. Korea didn't have the anti-war movement; because it only lasted 3 yrs. Just about the same amount of time as WWII did for the US.


Was the Civil war larger than the Vietnam war?

More Americans died in the Civil War (625,000) than in any other war in history. In fact, more died in the Civil War than in WWII (405,399), WWI (116,516), Vietnam (58,151) and Korea (36,516) COMBINED.


Which war had more casualties Vietnam Korea or WW I?

In terms of fatalities: WWI had the most, followed by Viet Nam and Korea.


In what way might successes in Korea have later influenced the decision to become more deeply involved in Vietnam?

We stopped em (communists) in Korea, we'd stop em again in Vietnam. However, we didn't repeat one mistake...we did NOT invade North Vietnam as we DID invade North Korea during the Korean War. That action (in Korea) brought Red China into the war. We bombed North Vietnam, but did not invade it.


Examples of absolute and comparative advantage?

Absolute advantage: Vietnam can produce 1000 million tons of rice while South Korea can produce 800 million tons of rice => Vietnam has absolute advantage (since it can produce more than Korea) Comparative advantage: Same example: Vietnam and Korea. To produce 1 more tonnes of rice, Vietnam has to give up producing 3 cars. However, to produce 1 more tonnes of rice, South Korea only have to give up producing 1 cars. => There is a lower opportuniy cost for Korea to produce rice. i.e. South Korea has the comparative advantage.


Which war had more US combat deaths Korea or Vietnam?

world war two dummy


What proof exists that the Korean War was bloodier than the Vietnam War?

For now, we have very limited proof that the Koren War was bloodier. This is basically because the wars were fought during completely different times. The technological development from Korea to Vietnam was immense. So i would have to say that ultimately the Vietnam war was bloodier than the Korean War for the U.S. We lost more soldiers in Vietnam than any other war and knowing this fact, one can conclude that the Vietnam War was more bloodier.