0
What else can I help you with?
What was the role of the senate in the in Roman society?
A senator in Roman society was one of the wealthy class. He did not nastily have to be a patrician or a plebeian, (he could be an equite or an appointee by a emperor) but he did have to have a net worth of at least a million sesterces to met the financial requirement for entrance to the senate. Once in the senate his role like the other senators was to discuss and come to a conclusion regarding some issue. The senate aced as an advisory body to the consuls an later to the emperors. All new emperors were ratified by the senate.A senator in Roman society was one of the wealthy class. He did not nastily have to be a patrician or a plebeian, (he could be an equite or an appointee by a emperor) but he did have to have a net worth of at least a million sesterces to met the financial requirement for entrance to the senate. Once in the senate his role like the other senators was to discuss and come to a conclusion regarding some issue. The senate aced as an advisory body to the consuls an later to the emperors. All new emperors were ratified by the senate.A senator in Roman society was one of the wealthy class. He did not nastily have to be a patrician or a plebeian, (he could be an equite or an appointee by a emperor) but he did have to have a net worth of at least a million sesterces to met the financial requirement for entrance to the senate. Once in the senate his role like the other senators was to discuss and come to a conclusion regarding some issue. The senate aced as an advisory body to the consuls an later to the emperors. All new emperors were ratified by the senate.A senator in Roman society was one of the wealthy class. He did not nastily have to be a patrician or a plebeian, (he could be an equite or an appointee by a emperor) but he did have to have a net worth of at least a million sesterces to met the financial requirement for entrance to the senate. Once in the senate his role like the other senators was to discuss and come to a conclusion regarding some issue. The senate aced as an advisory body to the consuls an later to the emperors. All new emperors were ratified by the senate.A senator in Roman society was one of the wealthy class. He did not nastily have to be a patrician or a plebeian, (he could be an equite or an appointee by a emperor) but he did have to have a net worth of at least a million sesterces to met the financial requirement for entrance to the senate. Once in the senate his role like the other senators was to discuss and come to a conclusion regarding some issue. The senate aced as an advisory body to the consuls an later to the emperors. All new emperors were ratified by the senate.A senator in Roman society was one of the wealthy class. He did not nastily have to be a patrician or a plebeian, (he could be an equite or an appointee by a emperor) but he did have to have a net worth of at least a million sesterces to met the financial requirement for entrance to the senate. Once in the senate his role like the other senators was to discuss and come to a conclusion regarding some issue. The senate aced as an advisory body to the consuls an later to the emperors. All new emperors were ratified by the senate.A senator in Roman society was one of the wealthy class. He did not nastily have to be a patrician or a plebeian, (he could be an equite or an appointee by a emperor) but he did have to have a net worth of at least a million sesterces to met the financial requirement for entrance to the senate. Once in the senate his role like the other senators was to discuss and come to a conclusion regarding some issue. The senate aced as an advisory body to the consuls an later to the emperors. All new emperors were ratified by the senate.A senator in Roman society was one of the wealthy class. He did not nastily have to be a patrician or a plebeian, (he could be an equite or an appointee by a emperor) but he did have to have a net worth of at least a million sesterces to met the financial requirement for entrance to the senate. Once in the senate his role like the other senators was to discuss and come to a conclusion regarding some issue. The senate aced as an advisory body to the consuls an later to the emperors. All new emperors were ratified by the senate.A senator in Roman society was one of the wealthy class. He did not nastily have to be a patrician or a plebeian, (he could be an equite or an appointee by a emperor) but he did have to have a net worth of at least a million sesterces to met the financial requirement for entrance to the senate. Once in the senate his role like the other senators was to discuss and come to a conclusion regarding some issue. The senate aced as an advisory body to the consuls an later to the emperors. All new emperors were ratified by the senate.
Why did bonnie prince charlie stand at the back of the battle?
He wanted to be able to observe the battle and issue commands to his army; which is difficult to do when someone is shooting at you.
Is the proper spelling Romans' or Roman's when you talking about them owning something?
The noun "Roman" is tricky. It can be a singular noun, such as, "the Roman lives here " or an adjective such as "the Roman empire". I have seen the possessive used both ways but Roman's is most common. You could always sidestep the issue by using the phrase "of the Romans" such as, "the territory of the Romans" instead of the Romans' territory.The noun "Roman" is tricky. It can be a singular noun, such as, "the Roman lives here " or an adjective such as "the Roman empire". I have seen the possessive used both ways but Roman's is most common. You could always sidestep the issue by using the phrase "of the Romans" such as, "the territory of the Romans" instead of the Romans' territory.The noun "Roman" is tricky. It can be a singular noun, such as, "the Roman lives here " or an adjective such as "the Roman empire". I have seen the possessive used both ways but Roman's is most common. You could always sidestep the issue by using the phrase "of the Romans" such as, "the territory of the Romans" instead of the Romans' territory.The noun "Roman" is tricky. It can be a singular noun, such as, "the Roman lives here " or an adjective such as "the Roman empire". I have seen the possessive used both ways but Roman's is most common. You could always sidestep the issue by using the phrase "of the Romans" such as, "the territory of the Romans" instead of the Romans' territory.The noun "Roman" is tricky. It can be a singular noun, such as, "the Roman lives here " or an adjective such as "the Roman empire". I have seen the possessive used both ways but Roman's is most common. You could always sidestep the issue by using the phrase "of the Romans" such as, "the territory of the Romans" instead of the Romans' territory.The noun "Roman" is tricky. It can be a singular noun, such as, "the Roman lives here " or an adjective such as "the Roman empire". I have seen the possessive used both ways but Roman's is most common. You could always sidestep the issue by using the phrase "of the Romans" such as, "the territory of the Romans" instead of the Romans' territory.The noun "Roman" is tricky. It can be a singular noun, such as, "the Roman lives here " or an adjective such as "the Roman empire". I have seen the possessive used both ways but Roman's is most common. You could always sidestep the issue by using the phrase "of the Romans" such as, "the territory of the Romans" instead of the Romans' territory.The noun "Roman" is tricky. It can be a singular noun, such as, "the Roman lives here " or an adjective such as "the Roman empire". I have seen the possessive used both ways but Roman's is most common. You could always sidestep the issue by using the phrase "of the Romans" such as, "the territory of the Romans" instead of the Romans' territory.The noun "Roman" is tricky. It can be a singular noun, such as, "the Roman lives here " or an adjective such as "the Roman empire". I have seen the possessive used both ways but Roman's is most common. You could always sidestep the issue by using the phrase "of the Romans" such as, "the territory of the Romans" instead of the Romans' territory.
In ancient Rome who made up the senate and what did they do?
The Roman senate was not a legislative body. During the 244-year period of the monarchy it was the advisory body of the king. We do not have any information about what it did. We have indications that there were debates in the senate. During the 482-year period of the Roman republic the senators were members of the patrician aristocracy and former executive officers of state. They were enrolled by the censors until the reforms of Sulla in 80 BC. It was the advisory body of the consuls, the two annually elected heads of the republic. It debated policy matters and issued advice on this. It also gave advice on the drafting of bills. In some circumstances it could issue decrees. During the 506-year period of rule by emperors the emperors were absolute rulers and the senate was emasculated.
What was the issue that caused the conflict between pope Gregory vll andthe holy roman Henry lv?
The issue was the Investiture Controversy, the question of who had the right to choose new bishops.
What would Roman emperors issue as commands?
The Roman emperors had the authority to issue almost anything as commands. These things were variable, such as a proposal for a new law, a donative to the people, the movement of military legions, the construction of new buildings or the issuing of new coins. - Update- However, Roman emperors would issue edicts, which were commands that were equivalent to laws.
A user types the enable command what task can be performed at the privilleged exec mode?
Issue show and debug commands
President had to issue commands through general of the army?
yes
What are special keys programmed to issue commands to the computer?
Function key
What was the role of the senate in the in Roman society?
A senator in Roman society was one of the wealthy class. He did not nastily have to be a patrician or a plebeian, (he could be an equite or an appointee by a emperor) but he did have to have a net worth of at least a million sesterces to met the financial requirement for entrance to the senate. Once in the senate his role like the other senators was to discuss and come to a conclusion regarding some issue. The senate aced as an advisory body to the consuls an later to the emperors. All new emperors were ratified by the senate.A senator in Roman society was one of the wealthy class. He did not nastily have to be a patrician or a plebeian, (he could be an equite or an appointee by a emperor) but he did have to have a net worth of at least a million sesterces to met the financial requirement for entrance to the senate. Once in the senate his role like the other senators was to discuss and come to a conclusion regarding some issue. The senate aced as an advisory body to the consuls an later to the emperors. All new emperors were ratified by the senate.A senator in Roman society was one of the wealthy class. He did not nastily have to be a patrician or a plebeian, (he could be an equite or an appointee by a emperor) but he did have to have a net worth of at least a million sesterces to met the financial requirement for entrance to the senate. Once in the senate his role like the other senators was to discuss and come to a conclusion regarding some issue. The senate aced as an advisory body to the consuls an later to the emperors. All new emperors were ratified by the senate.A senator in Roman society was one of the wealthy class. He did not nastily have to be a patrician or a plebeian, (he could be an equite or an appointee by a emperor) but he did have to have a net worth of at least a million sesterces to met the financial requirement for entrance to the senate. Once in the senate his role like the other senators was to discuss and come to a conclusion regarding some issue. The senate aced as an advisory body to the consuls an later to the emperors. All new emperors were ratified by the senate.A senator in Roman society was one of the wealthy class. He did not nastily have to be a patrician or a plebeian, (he could be an equite or an appointee by a emperor) but he did have to have a net worth of at least a million sesterces to met the financial requirement for entrance to the senate. Once in the senate his role like the other senators was to discuss and come to a conclusion regarding some issue. The senate aced as an advisory body to the consuls an later to the emperors. All new emperors were ratified by the senate.A senator in Roman society was one of the wealthy class. He did not nastily have to be a patrician or a plebeian, (he could be an equite or an appointee by a emperor) but he did have to have a net worth of at least a million sesterces to met the financial requirement for entrance to the senate. Once in the senate his role like the other senators was to discuss and come to a conclusion regarding some issue. The senate aced as an advisory body to the consuls an later to the emperors. All new emperors were ratified by the senate.A senator in Roman society was one of the wealthy class. He did not nastily have to be a patrician or a plebeian, (he could be an equite or an appointee by a emperor) but he did have to have a net worth of at least a million sesterces to met the financial requirement for entrance to the senate. Once in the senate his role like the other senators was to discuss and come to a conclusion regarding some issue. The senate aced as an advisory body to the consuls an later to the emperors. All new emperors were ratified by the senate.A senator in Roman society was one of the wealthy class. He did not nastily have to be a patrician or a plebeian, (he could be an equite or an appointee by a emperor) but he did have to have a net worth of at least a million sesterces to met the financial requirement for entrance to the senate. Once in the senate his role like the other senators was to discuss and come to a conclusion regarding some issue. The senate aced as an advisory body to the consuls an later to the emperors. All new emperors were ratified by the senate.A senator in Roman society was one of the wealthy class. He did not nastily have to be a patrician or a plebeian, (he could be an equite or an appointee by a emperor) but he did have to have a net worth of at least a million sesterces to met the financial requirement for entrance to the senate. Once in the senate his role like the other senators was to discuss and come to a conclusion regarding some issue. The senate aced as an advisory body to the consuls an later to the emperors. All new emperors were ratified by the senate.
Were the first Catholics pacifist?
Yes. The early Christians (whom we consider also to be the first Catholics) often refused to be inducted into the Roman army. They did this for two reasons: (1) the Roman army required its members to sacrifice to the pagan gods, which Christians refused to do; and (2) at times the Roman army officers would issue commands that Christians felt were deplorable, such as to slaughter unarmed civilians.
Will issue funds to the bases using Automated Funds Management system?
Major Commands (MAJCOMs)
What prompt can you issue show commands to investigate a Cisco Router?
User enable. router> enable router#
Did the roman senate have the same lawmaking power as the US?
No it did not. The Roman senate was different that the US one. During the Roman Republic it was an unelected an advisory body for the consuls (the two annually elected heads of the Republic) made up of aristocrats and oligarchs. Senators neither proposed bills nor voted on them. In the early Republic the consuls were those who proposed bills, which were put to the vote of the Assembly of the Soldiers. Later it was mainly the plebeian tribunes who proposed bills and these were put to the vote of the Plebeian Council. The senate could, in certain circumstances, issue decrees. Later, during the period of rule by emperors, the senate was emasculated as the emperors were absolute rulers.
What commands does theseus issue to philostrate?
Theseus commands Philostrate to find entertainment for the evening, manage the festivities and ensure everything runs smoothly. He also instructs Philostrate to oversee the preparations for the upcoming wedding celebration.
A single keystroke or command or a series of keystrokes or commands used to automatically issue a longer predetermined series of keystrokes or commands is called a what?
A single keystroke or command that initiates a longer predetermined series of keystrokes or commands is called a "macro." Macros are commonly used in software applications to automate repetitive tasks, enhancing efficiency and productivity by executing complex commands with a single action.
Why did money lose it's value in rome?
Starting from Nero (the third emperor) several emperors debased the Roman coins. The progressively decreased the precious metal content, which devalued them. They did so to issue more coins to pay for their expenses, unaware of the devaluation problem. Eventually the coins could have as little as only 5% of gold or silver.
