answersLogoWhite

0

The acquisition of overseas possessions by the U.S. can be viewed from multiple perspectives. Proponents argue that it expanded American influence, provided strategic military and economic advantages, and facilitated access to resources and markets. Critics, however, contend that such actions often disregarded the sovereignty and rights of local populations, leading to conflicts and ethical dilemmas. Ultimately, whether it was justified depends on the balance of these historical consequences and ethical considerations.

User Avatar

AnswerBot

1mo ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

Why did the US allow overseas possessions?

It had not been forbidden in the US Constitution.


Who wanted the US to extend its influence and power through overseas possessions?

expansionists


Which president was the First US acquired overseas territory during his presidency?

William Mckinley


Which possessions or protectorates are not islands?

Panama Canal zone and Alaska.


Why was President Harding's promise to distance the US for foreign affairs hard to achieve?

The nation had overseas possessions it intended to keep


How can any of us overcome a love for worldly possessions?

People should read the Bible and see what the consequences of such "love" is.


Who fought against who in Spanish-American War?

That would be Spain and their colonies against the United States. It was a pretty short war, lasting a matter of months. The US acquired a number of possessions, including Puerto Rico and the Philippines.


Should US businesses operating overseas be required to pay their local employees a minimum wage?

US employers operating overseas - like French employers operating outside France - comply with the labor laws of the countries within which they operate. IF those nations have wage laws, all employers must comply. US law cannot bind the overseas employees of a US firm, except where Congress specifies that intent, and then apply only to US citizens working overseas, never to foreigners.


Which argument was used to support US acquisition of overseas possessions in the late 1800s?

In the late 1800s, proponents of U.S. acquisition of overseas possessions argued that it was essential for expanding trade and economic interests, particularly in Asia and the Pacific. They believed that establishing coaling stations and naval bases would enhance national security and promote American influence globally. Additionally, the ideology of Manifest Destiny was invoked, suggesting that it was America's duty to spread democracy and civilization to other parts of the world. This combination of economic, strategic, and ideological motivations drove the push for overseas expansion during that period.


Which possessions or protectorates are islands?

Panama Canal zone and Alaska.


Which of the possessions or protectorates is closest to the US?

cuba


Possessions or protectorates was closest to the US?

cuba