The acquisition of overseas possessions by the U.S. can be viewed from multiple perspectives. Proponents argue that it expanded American influence, provided strategic military and economic advantages, and facilitated access to resources and markets. Critics, however, contend that such actions often disregarded the sovereignty and rights of local populations, leading to conflicts and ethical dilemmas. Ultimately, whether it was justified depends on the balance of these historical consequences and ethical considerations.
The US gained possession of Guam, Cuba, Puerto Rico and the Phillipines. Note that although the US no longer owns Cuba, it does still control Guantanamo Bay, and the Philippines was granted Independence after WW2.
The US was never acquired. It broke away from Great Britain as a result of the Revolutionary War that ended in 1781.
Oregon
The US acquired free navigation of the Mississippi River in 1795. This was established through a treaty which Pinckney negotiated.
Texas was acquired to the US because of "Manifest Destiny" this means that land in the name of "God" was to be taken to the Seas.
It had not been forbidden in the US Constitution.
expansionists
William Mckinley
Panama Canal zone and Alaska.
The nation had overseas possessions it intended to keep
People should read the Bible and see what the consequences of such "love" is.
That would be Spain and their colonies against the United States. It was a pretty short war, lasting a matter of months. The US acquired a number of possessions, including Puerto Rico and the Philippines.
US employers operating overseas - like French employers operating outside France - comply with the labor laws of the countries within which they operate. IF those nations have wage laws, all employers must comply. US law cannot bind the overseas employees of a US firm, except where Congress specifies that intent, and then apply only to US citizens working overseas, never to foreigners.
In the late 1800s, proponents of U.S. acquisition of overseas possessions argued that it was essential for expanding trade and economic interests, particularly in Asia and the Pacific. They believed that establishing coaling stations and naval bases would enhance national security and promote American influence globally. Additionally, the ideology of Manifest Destiny was invoked, suggesting that it was America's duty to spread democracy and civilization to other parts of the world. This combination of economic, strategic, and ideological motivations drove the push for overseas expansion during that period.
Panama Canal zone and Alaska.
cuba
cuba